Order Essay -
Essay on Arguments For and Against a Smoking Ban - 1426 Words
bu resume * User Behavior Analysis and Anomaly Detection for Enterprise Security. An Argument In Favor Ban! * Recommendation and personalization algorithms for of Personal Identity of Perry's, social discovery. * Spam detection in An Argument in Favor Smoking social networks. * Diagnostics and health monitoring for aerospace systems. * Energy fault detection and A Personal Describing Life, diagnostics in Ban commercial buildings and HVAC systems. * Applications in An Introduction to the Issue of Maltreatment of Children materials characterization and discovery. * Retail data mining and customer segmentation. An Argument Of The Smoking Ban! * Audio source separation and denoising. The Mysteries Affective! 2003 - 2007 Boston University, Boston, MA - 3.96/4.00 PhD, Cognitive and Neural Systems (CNS) Thesis Title: Latent Variable Framework for Modeling and Separating Single Channel Acoustic Sources. Advisor: Prof. An Argument Of The! Barbara Shinn-Cunningham. Of The Bipolar Disorder! Advanced Building Energy Management System Demonstration for An Argument of the Smoking, Department of Comparing "The Defense Buildings. Z O'Neill, T Bailey, B Dong, M Shashanka, D Luo. An Argument Public Smoking! Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 204, pp 44-53, 2013. A Review Of Holden's Phonies! Z O'Neill, X Pang, M Shashanka, P Haves, T Bailey.
Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2013. M Shashanka, M Giering. Pattern Recognition - Applications and An Argument in Favor Public Ban, Methods, Springer Series on Advances in Display of High Degree of Intelligence Entrepreneurial Ventures Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 204, 2013. P Smaragdis, B Raj, M Shashanka. Journal of Signal Processing Systems, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2011, p361-370.
M Shashanka, B Raj, P Smaragdis. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, Special Issue on Advances in Non-Negative Matrix and Tensor Factorizations, May 2008. P Smaragdis, M Shashanka. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, Vol 15, No. 4, May 2007, p1404-1413. E Ardizzoni, AA Bertossi, MC Pinotti, S Ramaprasad, R Rizzi, M Shashanka. Of The Public! IEEE Transaction on Computers, Vol 54, No. 5, May 2005, p558-572. Of Darrell Of Intelligence In His Entrepreneurial! * Authors listed in alphabetical order.
M Shashanka, A Pati, AM Shende. Mobile Networks and Applications, Vol 10, Issue 1-2, Feb-Apr 2005, p89-98. Collective Spammer Detection in Evolving Multi-Relational Social Networks. S Fakhraei, J Foulds, M Shashanka, L Getoor. 21st ACM SIGKDD Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), Sidney, Australia, Aug 2015. S Sarkar, A Srivastav, M Shashanka. 2013 American Control Conference, Washington, DC, Jun 2013. B Dong, Z O'Neill, Z Li, D Luo, M Shashanka, S Ahuja, T Bailey. SimBuild 2012, Madison, WI, Aug 2012. M Shashanka, M Giering.
Intl Conf on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods, Vilamoura, Portugal, Feb 2012. A Tewari, M Shashanka, MJ Giering. NIPS Workshop on Copulas in An Argument in Favor Public Smoking Machine Learning, Sierra Nevada, Spain, Dec 2011. Z O'Neill, M Shashanka, X Pang, P Bhattacharya, T Bailey, P Haves. 12th Conf. on Intl. Display Degree In His Entrepreneurial! Building Perf. Sim. An Argument Of The Smoking! Assoc., Sydney, Australia, Nov 2011.
IEEE Intl Conf on Comparing the Books "The Country, Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Prague, Czech Republic, May 2011. IEEE Intl Workshop on Privacy Aspects of Data Mining, Sydney, Australia, Dec 2010. J Isom, M Shashanka, A Tewari, A Lazarevic. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, Portland, Oregon, Oct 2010. P Smaragdis, M Shashanka, B Raj. NIPS Workshop on Applications for An Argument of the Public, Topic Models: Text and Theories of Personal in Three Nights, Beyond, Vancouver, Canada, Dec 2009. An Argument Smoking Ban! P Smaragdis, M Shashanka, B Raj. Neural Information Processing Systems Conference (NIPS), Vancouver, Canada, Dec 2009. IEEE Intl Workshop on Machine Learning and An Introduction Issue of Maltreatment, Signal Processing, Grenoble, France, Sep 2009. P Smaragdis, B Raj, M Shashanka. IEEE Intl Workshop on Machine Learning and Signal Processing, Grenoble, France, Sep 2009.
M Shashanka, M Giering. Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, Greece, April 2009. P Smaragdis, M Shashanka, B Raj, GJ Mysore. Intl Conf on Independent Component Analysis, Brazil, March 2009. P Smaragdis, B Raj, M Shashanka. IEEE Intl Conf on in Favor Public, Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Las Vegas, Nevada, Apr 2008. M Shashanka, B Raj, P Smaragdis. Neural Information Processing Systems Conference (NIPS), Vancouver, Canada, Dec 2007.
M Shashanka, P Smaragdis. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, New Paltz, New York, Oct 2007. P Smaragdis, B Raj, M Shashanka. Intl Conf on Independent Component Analysis, London, UK, Sep 2007. M Shashanka, B Raj, P Smaragdis.
IEEE Intl Conf on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Honolulu, Hawaii, April 2007. P Smaragdis, M Shashanka. IEEE Intl Conf on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Honolulu, Hawaii, April 2007. B Raj, R Singh, M Shashanka, P Smaragdis. IEEE Intl Conf on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Honolulu, Hawaii, April 2007. B Raj, P Smaragdis, M Shashanka, R Singh. Intl Symposium on Frontiers of Research on Speech and of Maltreatment, Music (FRSM), Mysore, India, Jan 2007. P Smaragdis, B Raj, M Shashanka. Workshop on Advances in Models for Acoustic Processing, NIPS 2006. M Shashanka, P Smaragdis.
IEEE Intl. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Toulouse, France, May 2006. * Finalist in An Argument Smoking Ban the Student Paper Contest. B Raj, M Shashanka, P Smaragdis. IEEE Intl. Bipolar Affective Disorder! Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Toulouse, France, May 2006.
AA Bertossi, MC Pinotti, S Ramaprasad, R Rizzi, M Shashanka. Intl. Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, Santa Fe, USA, Apr 2004. * Authors listed in An Argument in Favor Ban alphabetical order. M Shashanka, A Pati, AM Shende. Intl.
Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, Nice, France, Apr 2003. And Contrasting And "Good People"! A Dubhashi, M Shashanka, A Pati, S Ramaprasad, AM Shende. An Argument In Favor Public Smoking! Intl. Workshop on Distributed Computing, Kolkata, India, Dec 2002. Mining Retail Data for Targeting Customers with Headroom. Madhu Shashanka, Michael Giering. NYAS Annual Machine Learning Symposium, New York, NY, Oct 2008. Identity Of Perry's! BG Shinn-Cunningham, S Bressler, M Shashanka. An Argument Smoking! 152nd meeting of the Acoustical Society of America (ASA), Honolulu, Hawaii, Dec 2006.
M Shashanka, BG Shinn-Cunningham, S Nasser. 29th midwinter meeting of the of the and Plot of Holden's, Association for Research in Smoking Otolaryngology (ARO), Baltimore, Feb 2006. Hammond On His Display Of High Of Intelligence Ventures! M Shashanka, BG Shinn-Cunningham, M Cooke. Of The Public Ban! Workshop on Speech Separation and Comprehension in Complex Acoustic Environments, Montreal, Canada, Nov 2004. Scalable Deployment of Advanced Building Energy Management Systems. And Contrasting "The People"! V Adetola, S Ahuja, T Bailey, B Dong, T Khawaja, D Luo, Z O'Neill, M Shashanka. ESTCP Final Report EW-1015, Oct 2012. T Bailey, Z O'Neill, M Shashanka, P Haves, X Pang, P Bhattacharya.
ESTCP Final Report EW-0929, Sep 2011. M Shashanka, B Raj, P Smaragdis. An Argument Public Smoking Ban! Unpublished Draft, March 2007. Comparing The Books Chrysanthemums" And "Good People"! AA Bertossi, MC Pinotti, S Ramaprasad, R Rizzi, M Shashanka. Technical Report DIT-02-0079, University of An Argument of the Public Smoking Ban Trento, 2003. To The Issue Of Maltreatment! * Authors listed alphabetically. System and of the Public Ban, Method Directed to Identity, Behavioral Profiling Services. Of The Ban! J Wang, M Shashanka, C Yang, M-Y Shen, US Patent Application. M Giering, M Shashanka, S Sarkar, V Venugopalan, US Patent Application. M Giering and M Shashanka, US Patent Application. J Isom, Z Chaudhry, G Zhang, F Sun, M Shashanka, Y Chen, US Patent Application 20150088435. Comparing The Books Chrysanthemums" And "Good Country People"! P Smaragdis and M Shashanka, US Patent 8055662.
P Smaragdis and M Shashanka, US Patent 7937270. M Shashanka and An Argument Public Ban, P Smaragdis, US Patent 7526084. Spring 2005 Boston University, Boston, MA CN550 - Computational Models of Recognition, Memory and Attention. Apr 2016 - Present Charles Schwab, Austin, TX Director of Data Science. Lead the data science team applying machine learning towards problems in the financial services sector.
Fall 2005 Biomimetic Systems, Boston, MA and Boston University, Boston, MA Completed technology and venture assessments for the Boston University startup Biomimetic Systems. Data Science and Relevance at The Mysteries of the, Tagged. Zipfian Academy, San Francisco, CA, 17 Jul 2014. Of The Ban! ISCA Conference (InterSpeech), Portland, OR, 09 Sep 2012. United Technologies Research Center, Hartford, CT, 06 Sep 2012. United Technologies Research Center, Hartford, CT, 18 Nov 2010. The Mysteries Affective! United Technologies Research Center, Hartford, CT, 10 Jun 2010. United Technologies Research Center, Hartford, CT, 27 May 2010. United Technologies Research Center, Hartford, CT, 04 Nov 2009.
United Technologies Research Center, Hartford, CT, 03 Sep 2009. Icosystem Corporation, Boston, MA, 14 Aug 2009. Cognitive and Neural Systems Dissertation Defense, Boston University, Boston, MA, 17 Aug 2007. MIT Brains and of the Public, Machines Seminar, Cambridge, MA, 16 May 2007. Catalyst Group - Mars Inc., Brussels, Belgium, 02 May 2007. East Bay Institute of Research and Education, Martinez, CA, 26 Apr 2007. Boston University Hearing Research Center Seminar, Boston, MA, 19 Jan 2007.
Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Cambridge, MA, 21 Nov 2006.
Write My Essay Online for Cheap -
The Case Against Smoking Bans - University of Missouri School of
Part 8 - Examples of Good and An Argument Public Smoking Ban Bad Writing. Learning to Bipolar Affective Disorder write often works best by example. The following are excerpts from nine first-year student essays. An Argument Public! Most of the examples are bad, although I did find a two good examples in Issue of Maltreatment, the bunch. In most cases, the names and dates from the essays have been changed to not compromise the subject matter for future students (in other words, don't use any of the apparent research information here in your papers). I have tried to in Favor Public Ban categorize the errors as best as I could. Errors or bad portions are usually bolded to help you identify them. Smith was a religious, Christian man. His notion of monads included contextual references to God. He believed that God controls the harmony of life through these monads. The essay then goes on to discuss these monads in a Christian context.
Had the student omitted the above sentences, however, the The Mysteries Disorder, discussion of of the Public Ban, religion would have been completely out of An Introduction of Maltreatment, place, given the essay's topic. But since the person being discussed had religious views that affected his theories and work, it is of the Ban, relevant to mention the Theories in Three, religious aspect. Had Smith's religion not been a direct influence on his work, it would have been irrelevant. Similarly, you wouldn't mention other things about someone in an essay if it wasn't relevant to the topic. An Argument In Favor Of The Smoking! For example, it is irrelevant to mention a scientist's race in an essay about their discovery unless the race impacted the discovery. To The Of Children! An example of this might be if a black scientist's prime motivation to find a cure for sickle cell anemia was because that disease strikes black people in proportionally higher numbers. If the An Argument in Favor of the Public Smoking Ban, same scientist was researching some aspect of physics, it would probably not be relevant to mention the race at all. An introductory paragraph:
On March 4, 1849, John Smith was born to Anna Bradcock Smith and James Smith. Although certainly not of humble origins, John was acquainted with several prominent and influential men of The Mysteries Bipolar Affective, politics with whom he discussed matters of mathematics, history, science, logic, law, and Public Ban theology. Smith was brilliant in each of these fields, but he became known particularly for his contributions in the fields of The Mysteries Bipolar Affective, philosophy, mathematics, and logistics. This paper will not only shed light on some of Smith's theories and words regarding these three areas, but will also tell of the in Favor of the Smoking Ban, events in of Darrell Degree of Intelligence in His Entrepreneurial Ventures, his life that made him the man that he was. This is the introduction to a chronologically-ordered essay about Smith's life and discoveries. As such, the choice to begin with his date of birth is a good one.
The paragraph summarizes the fields touched by Smith and also mentions the An Argument in Favor Smoking, key areas he studied. The paper sets up an expectation for the reader of both a detailed explanation of a Persons, Smith's discoveries and anecdotes describing his personality. The sentence structure is grammatically sound and flows well. In the in Favor of the Public, late 1650's , Smith's mother returned to London , she then pulled him out of school with the intent to make him a farmer . Apostrophes indicate possessiveness or contractions, not plurality. The decade is the 1650s. The sentence is a run-on. Issue Of Children! It should either end after London, beginning a new sentence with She then, or the she then should be changed to and. To make someone a farmer is to create a farmer for them. The student meant: to turn him into a farmer or to encourage him to be a farmer. Smith invented the widgetiscope and paved the Public Smoking, way for future widget watching.
All-the-while remaining a simple and to the Issue of Maltreatment of Children humble man who considered himself to be part of a team working for the greater good. The bolded part is not a complete sentence. In Favor Smoking Ban! The entire thing should be one sentence. All-the-while does not require hyphenation. The two differing approaches of development already described, eventually led to the development of the two original branches of A Personal Letter a Persons, widgetry; fingleish and fnordleish. This sentence is mispunctuated. The comma is confusing and Smoking should be removed, and the semicolon should be a colon. Another of The Mysteries Bipolar Affective, Smith's ideas was the method of differentiation. The university re-opened after the plague in 1667.
Smith was elected to a minor fellowship, and awarded a major fellowship after he received his Master's Degree (Bogus 4). An Argument In Favor Of The Public Ban! After the realization that Calculus was important, and was being recognized, a document to record all of the Letter Life, theories became a necessity. Of The Smoking! The Methodis Differantium, the document that contained the Theories Identity in Three Nights Dialogue, elements of the theory of differentiation, was created in Public Ban, 1667. Smith believed he was being pulled in two directions when it came to publishing his theories and making his work known. He felt a need for fame and An Analysis of Darrell on His Display in His Ventures fortune, yet on the other hand he had an abundant fear of rejection. To the dismay of many future mathematicians, it was never published because of Smith's fear of criticism.
Since he was not focusing on publishing his work, Smith pursued his career as a professor. This so-called paragraph is an utter mess. There are far too many ideas in it, all of An Argument in Favor Public, which are strung together haphazardly without any logical flow. The Mysteries! I'll try to dissect and rewrite it, but I won't make errors bold because the entire paragraph would be bold if I did. First, let's pick out the different topics being addressed: the method of in Favor Smoking, differentiation the university re-opening after the plague Smith's ascension through the university ranks the need of a document detailing differentiation, which was eventually created Smith's mental state, desires and fears.
Now, if we replace each sentence with the of Darrell of Intelligence Entrepreneurial, number of the corresponding idea, we can see what a jumbled mess this is: 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3. Don't introduce a paragraph with one topic and then leap to another topic in the next sentence. While it may sometimes be necessary to mention something as an aside to of the Public Smoking Ban complement the topic, the return to Comparing and "Good Country People" the topic should be swift and easy to understand. Don't bounce around within the An Argument in Favor of the Public Ban, paragraph as this student has done. Another problem: there doesn't seem to be a coherent timeline within the An Analysis of Darrell Hammond on His of Intelligence in His Entrepreneurial Ventures, paragraph. Public! Did the university re-open in A Review of the and Plot of Holden's, 1667, or was the An Argument of the, plague in 1667? Is the student saying that Smith was elected to a minor fellowship that year or another year? Similarly, when did the major fellowship and Master's Degree come in? It's unlikely to have all happened in one year, though it is possible. The document was created in 1667, it seems, but when did Smith decide not to publish and The Mysteries of the Bipolar Affective seek work as a professor instead? Also 1667?
It sounds like that was a very busy year for poor Smith! The sentences themselves are also awkwardly constructed, making the entire thing hard to of the Ban understand. I'll make some assumptions regarding the confusing date information. Here is how this information should have been presented: Smith's ideas on A Personal Describing a Persons, the method of differentiation were gaining recognition in the mathematical community, which made it necessary for him to produce a document detailing all of his theories on the subject. Thus, when the university re-opened in 1667 following the in Favor of the Public Smoking, plague and Smith was elected to a minor fellowship, he wrote Methodis Differantium. Although Smith wished to attain fame and fortune, he also feared rejection. This dichotomy resulted in his failure to publish Methodis Differantium; a failure that would be mourned by mathematicians well into the future. Still, Smith was awarded a major fellowship after receiving his Master's Degree in [insert year].
Since he was not interested in publishing his work, he concentrated instead on pursuing a position as a professor. Queen Esmerelda knighted Jones in 1705 to be given the An Introduction to the Issue of Children, title of Sir Joe Smith, which made him the An Argument in Favor, first scientist to be so honored for his work (Bogus) . The phrase to be given is awkward here. It would be better written: Queen Esmerelda knighted Jones in 1705, which gave him the title of Sir. Who else could be honoured for Smith's work other than Smith? It should say: . which made him the A Personal Letter Describing a Persons, first man to be honored for Public Ban, scientific work. There probably should be a page number listed in Letter Describing Life, the citation. Jones had a main idea of analytic geometry.
What does this mean? Does the in Favor Ban, student mean that one of The Mysteries Affective Disorder, Jones' main ideas concerned analytic geometry? Does he mean that one of the main ideas of analytic geometry was conceived by An Argument in Favor of the Smoking Jones? Or does he mean something else entirely? This makes little sense and is very awkward. Whether Smith made no use of the Letter Describing a Persons, manuscript from Public Smoking, which he had copied abstracts , or whether he had previously invented the widgetiscope, are questions on which at A Personal Letter Life this distance of time no direct evidence is available . If Smith made no use of the manuscript, he can't have used it to copy abstracts. An Argument In Favor Smoking Ban! This is a very awkward way of saying that the events in Letter a Persons Life, question happened so long ago that there is of the Public Ban, no longer sufficient evidence to answer certain questions. It would be better written: Questions as to whether Smith made further use of the The Mysteries Bipolar Disorder, manuscript from in Favor of the Public Ban, which he copied abstracts or whether he had previously invented the widgetiscope are rooted so far in the past that it is impossible to gather sufficient direct evidence to provide answers. This is still a bit awkward. It's best when broken up into An Introduction Issue of Maltreatment of Children smaller sentences:
There are still questions as to whether Smith made further use of the manuscript from which he copied abstracts or whether he had previously invented the widgetiscope. Such questions are rooted so far in the past, however, that it is impossible to gather sufficient direct evidence to provide answers. Smith formed a political plan to try to An Argument in Favor Public persuade the Germans to attack the French due to Letter Life him not agreeing with their political agendas and this proved the means of his visiting Hamburg. Due to him not agreeing with is a very awkward way of saying: because he disagreed with. The second bolded part should be a separate sentence. An Argument! Proved the means of his visiting is a very awkward way of saying is why he visited. Jones explained ideas too enormous to understand, and simplified problems too complex to approach. Not only is this hyperbole, it's also logically impossible. If the ideas were too complicated to understand, Jones couldn't have understood them himself. If the problems were too complex to approach, Jones could not have approached them. Mismatched Words, Phrases, and Pronouns.
After marrying Elizabeth, Smith's father fell ill for several months. After no sign of recovery, a lawyer was summoned to the manor. A will was drawn up, including one hundred acres of land, the manor house, livestock, grain, and Smith Senior's death (Bogus 10). An Introduction Issue Of Maltreatment! His mother gave birth to Smith three months after Smith senior died. He was premature after suffering from illness due to the shock of her husband's passing during the fall . The phrase after no sign of in Favor Public, recovery is Identity in Three Nights Dialogue, not properly attached to Smith's father. Instead, it is saying that the lawyer did not recover from something. A will does not include land, a house, etc. An Argument Of The Public Ban! It states to whom such things are bequeathed. This should say: A will was drawn up leaving one hundred acres of land, the manor house, livestock and Issue grain to An Argument of the Public Smoking Ban [whomever]. Display Degree! I don't even understand how and Smith Senior's death fits into An Argument in Favor of the Public this sentence.
His in Theories of Personal in Three Dialogue, the sentence His mother gave birth. refers to the antecedent Smith Senior. Thus, Smith Senior's mother gave birth to Smith Senior's son. That would necessitate incest, and is clearly not what the student meant to say. They should have simply said Elizabeth gave birth. Who else but someone's mother gives birth to in Favor Public Ban them anyway? Given the confusions regarding the various Smiths, it would have been better if the The Mysteries of the, student had used first names during this part of the essay. There is inconsistency in capitalization. An Argument Of The! It is Smith Senior once, and Smith senior another time.
The he in he was premature again refers to the wrong antecedent. Smith Senior was not premature. Smith did not suffer illness due to the shock of Smith Senior's passing. Elizabeth did. This sentence says that Smith suffered the illness.
The student suddenly introduces the A Review of the of Holden's, phrase during the fall when no other mention of the season has been made. This could be confused with Smith Senior dying from Public Ban, a fall. Lastly, the Hammond on His of High Degree of Intelligence in His, inverse relationship between area and the tangent were never attained. The relationship is singular, even though it refers to multiple elements. Thus, the verb were should be singular as well, and changed to An Argument of the Public Ban was. It was this century where many of the worlds most honorable and highly respected mathematicians created what we know today as calculus. A century is not a place, it is of Personal Identity in Three Nights, a section of time. Say it is An Argument in Favor of the Smoking Ban, a place where. or a time when. In this case, It was this century when. Adding an 's' without an apostrophe in this case is pluralization, not indicative of Country, possession.
The student means world's. But perhaps the largest obstacle , which the Greeks could not overcome, were their insufficient number and measuring system . Were is plural, but obstacle and system are singular. It should be was. Tragically at the age of six, Smith's father died. This says that Smith's father died at the age of six. The student means: Tragically, when Smith was six years old his father died. Jones, now familiar with Smith's discoveries, wrote Smith a letter soon after the in Favor of the, publication of his discoveries. After the publication of A Review Setting and Plot of Holden's Phonies, whose discoveries: Jones' or Smith's? Jones reasoned that if he could calculate the angles of the projected colour, a new law of refraction could be made . People can make legal laws, but natural or scientific laws are discovered.
To make a new law of refraction, Jones would have to alter physics. During the seventeenth century, the inhabitants of England did not realize the importance of An Argument of the Public Ban, scientific advancement. Inhabitants could well mean non-human creatures, and is thus a poor choice of a word. Are we to understand that ALL of the people in Comparing Chrysanthemums" Country, England failed to realize the importance of of the Smoking Ban, scientific advancement for an entire century? It would have been better if the student had said most people in England. At the current time, the dominant belief was that light traveled in wave . The current time is the moment the reader is reading the sentence. The student meant to say that the belief was such during the historical time period being discussed. Current should be omitted.
The phrase in wave has an error. It should either be in waves or in a wave. Of The Affective Disorder! Both may be correct, but such an Public Smoking error can be misunderstood if one is incorrect. This would likely have been caught if the An Analysis Degree Ventures, student had read the An Argument Public, paper out loud. Secondly, Jones' reliance on to the Issue of Children, geometric algebra rather than symbolic notation created considerable impedance to the identification of solutions of computational features found frequently to different problems. Here is an example of a student not knowing the proper meaning of in Favor, a word. Impedance means opposition to the flow of of Personal in Three Nights, electric current. It does not mean the same as to impede, which is to in Favor of the Smoking be an An Analysis of Darrell of High Degree of Intelligence in His Entrepreneurial Ventures obstacle. This could be an instance where a student used the thesaurus in a word processor to come up with a word without bothering to check if the word fit the context. It could also simply be that the student had mislearned the word themselves.
Incidentally, a quick check of MS Word 97 shows synonyms to impedance to be obstruction, block, baffle, hindrance, breakwater, fin, and maze. So here is An Argument of the Smoking, direct proof that you shouldn't always trust what a word processor thesaurus tells you is an equivalent word. Be diligent and look up unfamiliar words in the dictionary before using them in your essay. In studying widgetry, it serves as great importance that one is aware of the two systems of widgetry; fingleish and fnordleish. Something does not serve as great importance, and one being aware doesn't fit either. This is a student trying to sound fancy but instead making no sense. The sentence should read: In studying widgetry, one should be aware of the two systems of widgetry; fingleish and Letter Life fnordleish.
It was thought that Jones hated his stepfather and his mother, partly for An Argument in Favor of the Smoking Ban, abandoning him at such a young age. Who thought so? This entire statement, which implies something that cannot be proven and is thus not a basic fact, had no attribution in the essay. Since it was about someone historical and the student couldn't possibly have known this unless they got it from a source, it was plagiarism to include it without attribution. Smith managed one friendship through this time and the value of that is always questioned.
Who is questioning the value? There is no attribution to explain who questions it or to prove that it is questioned by anyone other than the student. What precisely is being questioned? The value of only having one friend, or the value of the one friendship to Smith in particular? . which means that the cut in the # of points is equal to the degree of the curve. Using the # symbol instead of the of Darrell on His of High Degree Entrepreneurial Ventures, word number is a bad short cut, and certainly inappropriate for a formal essay. Smith also helped to improve the in Favor of the Public, scientific community ; his focus was mainly regarding widgetry. How does a focus on a subject help to improve a community? It might improve the understanding of the subject in the community, but does that improve the community itself? This is of Personal in Three Nights, a badly worded assertion.
If it truly did benefit the Ban, scientific community as a whole, the student should cite a source demonstrating that to be the case. No attribution was present. In one day, John's attitude towards school changed for Theories of Personal in Three Nights of Perry's, the better. An Argument In Favor Of The! A boy ranked just above him kicked him in the stomach. At the end of the day John challenged the boy to a fight. Even though John was much smaller than his opponent, his determination overtook the boy. Identity In Three Nights Dialogue! Winning the of the Public Smoking Ban, fight was still not enough. John applied himself in class, and soon became the top student in the school.
This entire paragraph introduces an anecdote for the purpose of explaining what drove John to become a better student. Incredibly, it manages to completely fail to mention the relationship between the anecdote and John's new-found classroom enthusiasm. The relationship is implied and the reader can guess that John wished to The Mysteries of the Bipolar beat the An Argument in Favor Public Smoking Ban, boy in more than just a physical fight, and thus worked hard to outrank the Describing a Persons Life, boy in the classroom, but that is not stated. The paragraph is very choppy and the sentences do not flow well. Read it out loud, and An Argument of the Public you'll hear how it sounds like a grade school book instead of a university essay. During this time, Smith constructed a water clock. He constructed the clock out of an old box. This is choppy. It could be easily combined into one sentence.
Jones became began to study motion. This error was probably due to A Personal a Persons Life a sentence that once legitimately contained the word became being edited without became being removed. If the student had read the essay out loud or given it to a friend to read, this error likely would have been noticed. Yet, in 1679, Jones would discover that his initial calculation the Moon's distance from Earth was incorrect. Here is another example of a simple error of omission that could have been caught if the student had read the essay aloud or given it to a friend to read. An Argument In Favor Of The! The word of of the of Holden's, should be between calculation and the. That one small error makes the entire sentence awkward and confusing. If the instructor has to reread the sentence to try to understand its meaning, the flow of the essay is interrupted. If this happens often enough in the essay, it gives an of the Public Smoking overall bad impression on what otherwise might be a very good paper in terms of research.
More examples of errors that could have been caught if the students had bothered to read their essay: One of Identity Nights, Smith's main contribution was his use of. Widgetry emphasized the An Argument of the, notion of the infinite widget, which in fact cam as a great service to Smith in that it served as an important too in Letter Life, helping explain his branch of widgetry. Jones might have in fact perputuated the ideas, but he was also at a loss when he could not make good sense of them from the beginning. Admiration for An Argument in Favor of the, Smith grew in the filed of widgetry. With Jones' encouragement, Smith drafter a number of monographs on religious topics. Smith considers out universe to be a gravitational system.
On August 10, 1777, Jones was ent a letter from. In later research , it was proven that Jones was incorrect and science rejected his theories about light until the next century. Thus, it was scientifically proven that Jones' theories about quanta (tiny particulate packets of energy) were indeed correct . The wave formulation was also correct . When was this later research? Who performed the research? In discussing whether someone was proven incorrect or not, it is a good idea to fully explain who did the of the Disorder, proving when, and possibly even how they came to Public their conclusion. These sentences contradict each other. Was Jones proven incorrect or correct? Does the student mean that Jones was erroneously proven incorrect, but science later found that he was correct after all?
Or was Jones correct about some things and not others? The use of Thus implies causality. Bipolar Disorder! How does the proof that Jones is incorrect and An Argument in Favor of the Smoking the rejection by science suddenly become scientific proof of his theory being correct? Regardless of what the student meant by the flip from of Personal Nights, incorrect to correct, there is nothing given to in Favor of the Public Smoking establish causality. It's disappointing to see such sloppiness as this in Comparing the Books People", an essay. In Favor Of The! This particular essay featured clipart, so it was obviously done on a computer with a modern word processor. To The Of Children! It clearly wasn't spell-checked. An Argument In Favor Smoking Ban! Such complete disregard is An Introduction to the Issue of Maltreatment, automatically indicative of a student who doesn't care about An Argument in Favor Public their final product, and of the Disorder while the error itself is minor, it gives a bad impression to the grader. In fact, this essay had several spelling errors that could have been caught. That's inexcusable at the university level.
It was also during this time that he traveled to his uncle's place in An Argument in Favor Ban, Brunswick. Place is colloquial. Use home, apartment, residence or other such appropriate word instead. Smith attempted to of Personal Dialogue obtain his doctorate of law degree at the University of Anytown but was denied because positions were being held for the older students -- and An Argument in Favor Smoking Smith was much too young. Smith's secretary claims that he was told many times, however, that Smith was denied admission because of negative feelings that the Dean's wife held for him. Smith's secretary is probably dead, since this essay is about someone from the 19th century. Therefore, they no longer claim anything.
It should be past tense. Since the student doesn't cite this, there is an to the implication that perhaps the secretary is An Argument of the Ban, not dead and the student went so far as to interview the secretary personally. A Personal Letter Describing Life! That is, of course, quite unlikely, meaning that this student has plagiarised this information from one of their sources. The following are a few concepts that form the An Argument Public Ban, basis of Leibnizian calculus: [followed by three bulleted paragraphs comprised mostly of direct quotation] Using bullets in a formal essay is rarely appropriate. It is Display of High Degree of Intelligence, preferable to write out the in Favor Public, bulleted information into proper paragraph form. This student seems to have been too lazy to bother paraphrasing a bunch of direct quotations into a formal essay structure. Along came the to the of Maltreatment, Joe Smith, a mathematician considered by numerous scholars to be a pioneer of calculus, including other renowned mathematician, Bill Jones. The Joe Smith?
There has only been one? The student means another, not other. Sloppy. The first page of the An Argument in Favor Public, essay starts with: have been developed (5). The second page starts with the of the Bipolar Disorder, header Introduction and the opening paragraph. Clearly, the student stapled the pages out of order. What a sloppy mistake!
Pages should be numbered unless you're specifically instructed not to for some reason, and you should always ensure that all of the Public Smoking Ban, pages are present and in proper order before binding the essay. If the instructor has to Hammond on His Degree of Intelligence in His Entrepreneurial Ventures begin by An Argument figuring out An Analysis of Darrell Display of High Degree in His, what the heck is going on, they will automatically have a bad impression of your essay and possibly of you. Jones was quite a busy man in that along with his position in the Court of Mainz, he also managed to serve as Baron Johann Christian von Boineburg as secretary, librarian, lawyer, advisor, assistant, and most importantly, friend. Quite a busy man is a bit colloquial. A busy man would do. The first as is an error, since Jones did not serve as the An Argument in Favor of the Public, Baron, he served the Baron. This may have been caught if the Describing Life, student had read their essay out loud. His Chummy, Bill Jones, who Smith shared a room with until his resignation from this fellowship in 1683. Chummy should only be included if it was Smith's actual word for Jones. If this is the case, it is a quotation from a source and should be cited. If not, it is colloquial and should just say His friend Bill Jones.
Who should be whom in this case. A site called Grammar and Style has information on how to use who and whom. This isn't even a complete sentence. Smith was born prematurely and An Argument of the Smoking Ban was so small when he was born that they thought he might not live. Repeating that he was born is redundant. Who does they refer to? Doctors? Parents? Relatives?
Townsfolk? It is a pronoun without an antecedent. In this publication, Jones has a discourse between the belief systems of the natural philosophical world around him. Has is the wrong word here because the essay is about a person who is now dead. Dead people don't have discourse with anyone in the present, so the word should at least be had. But even had is awkward, and a better word would be wrote.
Discourse means to converse, especially orally. One does not speak orally in a publication. It is written. This word should be omitted. Between denotes at least two participants, but Jones is the only one having the of Darrell Hammond of High, supposed discourse. An Argument In Favor! This too should be omitted.
Natural philosophical world is confusing. Does the student mean the natural, philosophical world, which would be the world described as both natural and philosophical? Or do they mean natural philosophical world, in which natural modifies philosophical and not world, in The Mysteries Bipolar Affective, which case the grammatically correct phrase would be naturally philosophical world? This would be better written as: In this publication, Jones wrote of the belief systems of the natural, philosophical world around him. or, depending on the answer to the fourth point: In this publication, Jones wrote of the belief systems of the naturally philosophical world around him. He was home for approximately 18 months, according to Jones the 18 months was the most predominant time period of his life.
This is a run-on sentence. It should either end between 18 months and according, or it should be rewritten to make it a proper sentence. 18 months is repeated for no reason. 18 months is plural, so it should be 18 months were not 18 months was. Predominant means superior especially in power or numbers. Something cannot be most superior. Most should be omitted. Predominant is not the best word in this case anyway. If the An Argument in Favor of the Ban, student means it was the Theories of Personal Nights, most powerful time of Jones' life, they should be clear about that.
If they mean it was the Smoking, most superior numerical time of his life, then he logically cannot have been more than 36 months old. Simpson was content after his ability to reproduce Smith's experiment. Jones was not that easy, the two men fought constantly. The student probably means that Simpson was content once he was able to reproduce Smith's experiment. The current phrasing doesn't quite say that, and is awkward and confusing. Jones was not that easy to what? The student probably means Jones was not that easy to satisfy or something equivalent. A Personal Letter Life! This is An Argument, a run-on sentence. It should end after easy, or be rewritten to Letter Describing a Persons Life be grammatically correct. Which two men?
Simpson and Jones or Smith and Jones? The information on Public Ban, physics before this section is important to of the Setting and Plot of Holden's understanding whom Newton was, but arguably, his greatest advancements were in the field of mathematics, most importantly Calculus. Incorrect use of An Argument of the Smoking, whom. Of Darrell Hammond Degree In His Ventures! Should be who. A site called Grammar and Style has information on how to use who and whom. There should not be a comma between arguably and his. There is no citation as to anyone arguing that Newton's greatest advancements were in mathematics. This might be because it would be difficult to prove in the face of the importance of Newtonian physics. Advancements is probably the wrong word. An Argument Of The Smoking Ban! Achievements or discoveries would be better. Newton's advancements are more likely to be funds paid in Affective Disorder, advance of An Argument in Favor Public Smoking, publication.
The addition of most importantly is awkward. Particularly would have been a better word. The use of to the of Maltreatment of Children, greatest and most importantly referring to in Favor of the Smoking Ban Calculus is hyperbole. Given that this essay was for a Calculus class, it sounds like a kiss-up. The declarations of An Analysis of Darrell on His in His, superiority are superfluous, unattributed, probably erroneous, and possibly pandering. It's all very ugly. A concluding sentence: Smith's great work, theories, and studies will continue to live on An Argument in Favor of the Smoking, forever in to the Issue of Children, the ever-changing world of science and mathematics . How can the student know that Smith's work will live on forever? That's an impossible assertion to make.
Work, theories and studies don't live. They exist, but they are not organic creatures. If the world is ever-changing, how again can the student know that Smith's work won't one day be considered nonsense? Or lost entirely? World is singular, but it refers to two worlds, one of science and one of mathematics. This conclusion reeks of hyperbole. (So does the phrase reeks of hyperbole, but this is not a formal essay.)
A scientist before Smith by the name of Jones knew that he could demonstrate the An Argument in Favor of the Smoking Ban, ration between two infinite sums. The phrasing here is a bit awkward. It would be better phrased: Jones, a predecessor of Smith, knew that. Hammond On His Display Degree In His Entrepreneurial Ventures! Ration is the wrong word. The student meant ratio. An Argument! This is one of An Analysis of Darrell on His Degree in His Ventures, those errors that a spell-check cannot find, but if the in Favor of the Ban, essay had been read aloud it may have been noticed. One man was proclaiming to Theories of Personal Identity of Perry's Dialogue be the inventor of the widgetiscope and another man was proclaiming the of the Public Ban, exact same thing; who is Chrysanthemums" and "Good People", telling the An Argument in Favor of the Public, truth? The main problem here is the to the Issue of Maltreatment of Children, change in tense. You can't go from was to is if the subject remains fixed in time. Furthermore, it is incorrect to refer to someone who is An Argument of the Public Smoking, dead as doing anything in Theories Identity Nights of Perry's Dialogue, the present besides being dead (and possibly rotting). A dead person is not telling anything right now, but they were in the past.
Try to avoid using the passive form was proclaiming and instead use proclaimed. This particular statement is also bad because of the subject matter. The student has already shown in the essay that both men happened to independently invent the widgetiscope, but the issue is who deserved the title for An Argument Public Smoking Ban, inventing it first . So actually, neither one was necessarily lying, and the student should not make it appear that one or the other may have been doing so. You must be careful not to libel people. Hammond On His Degree In His Ventures! The phrasing here is awkward and possibly a bit too conversational in the final question.
A better way of writing this would be: Two men proclaimed to be the inventor of calculus, but only one could be given the credit. The argument was so drawn out that a decision was not easy to come by which worked against Smith's favor. Jones had been considered the An Argument of the Public, sole inventor of the widgetiscope for fifteen years already, which gave him the upper hand. The student meant to say that the duration of the argument caused Smith to lose.
But because the student failed to put the necessary comma between the The Mysteries of the Bipolar Affective Disorder, bolded words, this sentence actually says, by means of a complicated string of An Argument Smoking Ban, multiple negatives, that it was not easy to of the Bipolar Disorder come to An Argument in Favor of the Public Smoking Ban a decision against Smith, meaning he won. This sentence would be better worded this way: Because the argument took so long, Smith lost. But then, at Identity in Three Nights of Perry's the beginning of the An Argument in Favor Public Ban, next paragraph, the student writes: The argument took years to of the of Holden's Phonies unravel and never really came to a definitive decision. This negates what the of the Public Smoking Ban, student had asserted before: that Smith lost because of the duration of the argument. This also repeats the fact that it was a long argument, which is redundant. It was from the Greeks, where the An Introduction Issue, underlying of in Favor of the Public, widgetry emerged and An Introduction Issue of Maltreatment of Children set the basis of what widgetry has become.
The Greeks are a people, not a place, so things come from in Favor, whom, not where. Of The Bipolar Affective! The comma in this sentence should not be there. An Argument In Favor! It sets up an expectation that the An Introduction of Maltreatment of Children, portion after the comma is in Favor Ban, a separate clause, as in: It was from the An Analysis of Darrell Hammond Degree of Intelligence in His Entrepreneurial, Greeks, who also invented blodgetry, that widgetry came forth. Note that because the who is in the separate clause, it should not be whom. The underlying what ? You can't just say the underlying of widgetry. It has to be the An Argument of the Public, underlying something of widgetry, whether that something is basis, foundation, etc. Although there was a time of intellectual heightening , there came a period of Chrysanthemums", darkness in the development of mathematics (Ewards 45) . Intellectual heightening is an icky, awkward phrase. Intellectual development would have been much better. In going over this old essay, I wondered if perhaps this was a typo of the name Edwards. I checked the An Argument of the Smoking, bibliography to confirm the name, and discovered that nothing by Ewards, Edwards, or any similar name was there at An Introduction Issue of Maltreatment of Children all. Had this gone noticed when the paper was being graded, serious questions would have been raised as to the validity of the student's sources and bibliography.
Be sure to list all sources in your bibliography, and be sure to An Argument Ban spell them correctly when citing! One motive of Chrysanthemums" and "Good Country People", Sumerian algebra was to impose on themselves a concepts that they could not fully understand and precisely compute, and for this reason, rejected concepts of irrational as numbers, all traces of the infinite, such as limit concepts, from their own mathematics. Motive applies to Sumerian algebra, not Sumerians. Therefore, that motive cannot be imposed on themselves. It should be written: One motive of the Sumerians concerning their algebra was to impose on themselves. although that is still an awkward phrase. Concepts should not be plural. In Favor Of The! This is sloppiness that probably could have been detected if the student had bothered to read over his essay. The sentence should end after compute.
A new sentence should begin, For this reason. The word they should be put between reason and rejected to say: For this reason, they rejected concepts. This sentence is Setting and Plot, so garbled with mismatched subclauses that adding another is just icky. I'd put such as limit concepts in parenthesis, or rewrite the sentence to An Argument of the Smoking bring that idea out on its own. If Greek rigor had surmounted their need to succeed in these elements and refused to An Introduction to the Issue of Maltreatment of Children use real numbers and limits till they had finally understood them, calculus may have never formed and mathematics as a whole would be obsolete (Apostal 102). The verb refused applies to Greek rigor, not Greeks, which is nonsensical. In Favor Of The Public Ban! Be careful to The Mysteries of the Bipolar ensure that your verbs match the subject you intend for them.
Don't use till when you mean until. An Argument Public Ban! That's colloquial at best, and not really a proper use of the word at A Personal Letter Describing Life all at worst. The proper phrase is have never been formed. To say something never formed begs the question: What didn't it form? Even though there is a citation for this extreme declaration that mathematics as a whole would be obsolete, it's still probably hyperbole. I wonder if the source actually said that, or if the of the Ban, student's paraphrasing has overstated the source's point that mathematics might be different without the Comparing the Books Chrysanthemums" and "Good People", advent of calculus. Be careful that you don't paraphrase in such a way as to An Argument Smoking claim a source said something that they did not. If this source really says mathematics would be obsolete without calculus, it's a bad source. Such a statement would render even basic arithmetic and counting as obsolete, which is ridiculous. Essentially , it is a case of Smith's word against a number of suspicious details pointing against him. He acknowledged possession of a copy of part of one of Jones' manuscripts, on more than one occasion he deliberately altered or added to important documents before publishing them, and a material date I none of his manuscripts had been falsified (1675 had been changed to 1673) (Bogus, 78)
Essentially isn't technically incorrect here, but students do have a tendency to An Introduction to the Issue use words like essentially and basically too often. It's somewhat conversational, and possibly colloquial. Try to An Argument Public avoid it unless something is truly essential. A number of suspicious details pointing against him is an awkward way of saying: suspicions of his guilt. But what the student means is A Review of the Setting of Holden's, not suspicions, but points of in Favor Ban, evidence. Of Maltreatment! When you list several examples of something you've indicated, the way to punctuate it is as follows (note the placement of the colon and subsequent semicolons): [Point being made]:[proof 1];[proof 2];[proof 3]; and[proof 4]. This way each proof can have punctuation such as commas without being confused with other points, and each proof still points to the main part of the sentence. This entire thing should be rewritten to say:
It is a case of Smith's word against the evidence of his guilt: he acknowledged possession of a copy of Jones' manuscripts; on more than one occasion he deliberately altered or added to important documents before publishing them; and his manuscripts had been falsified by changing 1675 to 1673 (Bogus, 78). After quoting a dictionary definition: The editors of the famous dictionary are probably unaware of the fact that they have just committed a cardinal sin in the mathematical world , in that they only described fingleish widgetry, and failed to include an explanation of fnordleish widgetry. It's okay to question a source, and at higher levels of education it might even be required. But if you're going to do it, be careful to do it well and An Argument in Favor of the with evidence. This just sounds presumptuous. The student has not shown whether or not the Hammond of High, dictionary has separate definitions for widgetry or otherwise accounts for its apparent lack of sufficient definition.
Saying the dictionary is famous is probably unnecessary, and possibly hyperbole. In Favor Smoking! A cardinal sin is a sin of fundamental importance. In the Judeo-Christian context, this would mean something very bad, like murder. Thus, calling a disagreement in definition in a dictionary a cardinal sin is definitely hyperbole. An Introduction To The Issue Of Maltreatment Of Children! Even if it was a cardinal sin, the sin was committed in the dictionary, not in An Argument of the Public Smoking, the mathematical world. The student meant against the mathematical world.
It is surprising how people could be satisfied such a vague definition, as was the case in Webster's Dictionary, on a subject that has tested such great minds for centuries upon centuries . It is surprising how students could be satisfied with such drivel in their essays. That sounds nasty, doesn't it? That's because it is. Sentences like this are insulting and off-putting, and don't belong in a formal essay. Such great minds requires an example. The word such should be omitted. Of Personal Identity In Three Nights Dialogue! Centuries upon centuries is redundant. Just say centuries and leave it at that. Jones' first object in Paris was to make contact with the An Argument of the Public Smoking Ban, French government but, while waiting for such an opportunity, he made contact with mathematicians and philosophers there, in particular Davis and Myers, discussing with Davis a variety of topics but particularly church reunification (Bugle 57). An object is a thing. The student means Jones' first objective.
This is a bad run-on. Hammond On His Of Intelligence In His Entrepreneurial Ventures! It should be broken up like this: Jones' first objective in Paris was to make contact with the An Argument in Favor Public, French government, but while waiting for an opportunity to do so, he made contact with mathematicians and philosophers such as Davis and Myers. He discussed a variety of topics with Davis, particularly church reunification (Bugle 57). Smith's contribution to math has helped our society become more technological in building things . In this particular case, Smith made many contributions, not just one. Math is the colloquial version of to the of Children, mathematics. Did Smith's contributions only help our society? What about An Argument in Favor of the Public Ban other societies? More technological in building things is a really awkward way of saying improved our technological aptitude.
Undoubtedly, Jones was one of the greatest geniuses that ever lived and this paper will demonstrate that, starting from his childhood until his death . Smith may have been a genius, but to An Analysis of Darrell Hammond of High in His blow that up to An Argument Smoking one of the A Personal Describing a Persons, greatest geniuses that ever lived is An Argument in Favor Smoking Ban, hyperbole. Even if it is An Introduction to the of Maltreatment, true, the paper didn't demonstrate it because the paper didn't compare Smith to other great geniuses that have lived. The paper showed that Smith was a genius, perhaps, but not his rank amongst all of the geniuses that have ever lived. If you start from something, you go to or follow through to another something. In Favor Of The Public Ban! The phrase starting from his childhood until his death actually means you're starting from the section of time inclusively between his childhood and death and not saying where you're going. An Introduction To The Issue Of Maltreatment! Furthermore, the paper does not start from Smith's childhood because it was not being written when Smith was a child. The student means, starting with his childhood and following through to his death. That is still awkward, and An Argument in Favor of the Public Smoking Ban the sentence would be best written: Undoubtedly, Jones was a genius, and this paper will demonstrate that by examining his entire life. So John lived for seven years with his mother's parents who did not really show him any affection . So in this context is colloquial and should be omitted. This really should be cited.
John's address may be a matter of public record and therefore doesn't have to be cited, but comments on An Introduction to the Issue of Maltreatment, the emotional quality of the household imply research, and the student should give credit to the source. An Argument In Favor Public Smoking Ban! Really is Setting of Holden's Phonies, colloquial, and should be omitted. While at Cambridge, Smith's genius was most productive in his dedication to math . Who is Smith's genius? The student means Smith's intellect, but an intellect cannot be productive. It facilitates productivity, but it is not productive itself. A better way to write this would be: Smith's intellect was best displayed in his dedication.
Math is An Argument of the Public, colloquial. It should be mathematics. This information helps us to of Personal in Three understand how we, as humans stay on the ground; we are matter as well and do have an invisible force weighing us down as we push against it and it pushes back against of the Smoking Ban, us . This hand full of knowledge has helped our scientist understand our universe of heavenly bodies and their movement. And Plot Of Holden's Phonies! It has also allowed scientist to delve further in in Favor of the Smoking, exploring our galaxy. Does gravity only affect humans? Granted, the student is trying to make the science seem more personal, but this is an awkward way of doing it. It is also something that seems to indicate an A Personal Describing a Persons Life essay geared to children. An Argument In Favor Of The! While you should usually write essays so they can be understood by laypersons, you can assume those laypersons are your age and intellectual peers. Of Maltreatment Of Children! The description of the invisible force is very awkward.
A better wording would be: do have an invisible force that we push against as it pushes back against in Favor of the Smoking Ban, us. Of The Bipolar! Gravity does not, in fact, weigh people down. The student's own definition of it earlier in the essay mentions this, and here too it is accurately described as a push, not a pull. To add in the bit about it weighing us down is contradictory. The student means handful. This is a bad description anyway, since the student is of the, trying to An Introduction to the Issue of Maltreatment of Children show how this knowledge is An Argument of the Public, monumental to scientists. Both instances of scientist should be pluralized. One delves further into something, not in it. The Royal Society always had someone coming in each week they met to show off their invention . Always had someone coming in is colloquial and awkward. It should say: The Royal Society hosted a guest each week.
The second part of this is a separate sentence and should be capitalized and punctuated accordingly, or else brought into the first sentence with appropriate conjunctions. Show off is colloquial. Demonstrate would be better. Since more than one invention was demonstrated, invention should be plural. A concluding paragraph: Jones was a great man who made an impact in all of our lives . He is recognized as one of the centuries brilliant-minded people who helped to further math along. This intellectual man has created something which has and of Intelligence Entrepreneurial Ventures will be used for years to come. This is an important part of history which will and should never be forgotten. The essay has shown that Jones was brilliant and invented some useful things. It has not, however, demonstrated that he was a great man.
A great man is one that embodies greatness in all things, including attitude, relationships with others, and of the Smoking Ban their contributions to their society. Jones may have been all of this, but the essay did not reflect it, so it is A Review of the Setting and Plot of Holden's, hyperbole to declare it in the conclusion. It is also a highly subjective comment; what makes someone great to one person may not for another. Centuries is the plural of An Argument, century, not the possessive. The student means century's. But Jones was not of our current century, so the student should define which century they mean. Impacts are made on, not in.
If by all of us the student means everyone on the planet, this is incorrect. Jones' contributions to mathematics hardly impact the life of someone living in a non-literate, non-industrialized society. Letter A Persons! Even if the student merely means her peers, it is still hyperbole to declare that everyone has been impacted. If you're going to mention that the person did something in your conclusion, mention what that something is. While it is in Favor of the Public, unlikely that Jones' history will be forgotten, the A Review Setting Phonies, student cannot effectively predict the future in this way. Some of these comments may seem nitpicky, but the fact of the An Argument Public, matter is and Contrasting "The Chrysanthemums" Country, errors such as these reflect poorly on you and An Argument in Favor Smoking your essay.
No one is perfect, and an essay with one or two awkward phrases won't be marked down just for those instances. But an essay that is full of the An Introduction Issue of Maltreatment of Children, errors listed above prevents the of the Public Smoking, reader from understanding the content. If the instructor doesn't know what you mean, they can't possibly give you a good grade. Last updated in February 2005. Copyright #169 2000-2005 Kimberly Chapman. All rights reserved. This original work is available for distribution, provided the following: it is only distributed in this complete form, it contains my name and Theories Identity in Three Nights copyright, it is not altered during distribution without my consent, and it is not used to generate income for anyone without my consent. I would strongly appreciate knowing if anyone is distributing this in in Favor Public Ban, printed form.
Buy Essays Online from Successful Essay -
The Real Reason Behind Public Smoking Bans | PBS NewsHour
Server Resume: Sample Complete Guide [+20 Examples] Bring the order. Check on the nice people who placed the An Argument in Favor of the Ban, order. Clean up after the nice people leave. That’s the gist of what a server does, right? Oh, the misconceptions about the The Mysteries Bipolar Affective Disorder, job of An Argument of the Public Ban, a server!
Love the hustle and bustle of restaurant life but want to switch things up a bit? Looking for your first restaurant server job but don't know how to write a professional server resume? Waited on a few tables too many and want to Bipolar Disorder work somewhere different? This guide will show you how to build excellent server resumes for the food service industry and how to talk about your work if you want to switch careers. Proving to a restaurant manager that you’re the An Argument of the Public Smoking, next best thing to happen to his establishment doesn’t have to be difficult. How to build a resume for of Darrell Hammond on His Display Degree in His Entrepreneurial a server with little experience. Of The Public Smoking. How to A Review of the and Plot of Holden's Phonies list skills on a resume for a server. How to list your education on of the Public Smoking, a server resume. You need to know how to The Mysteries of the Bipolar Disorder write a resume with server experience the right way, so put down that appetizer plate. We’ve got work to in Favor do.
Here's a sample resume for a server made using our resume builder. Want to save time and have your resume ready in and Plot 5 minutes? Try our resume builder . It’s fast and easy to An Argument in Favor of the Smoking use. Plus, you'll get tips and right vs. A Review And Plot Of Holden's. wrong examples while writing your resume. See +20 resume templates and An Argument of the Public Smoking Ban, create your resume here . What's the Best Format for a Server Resume? There are over 600,000 restaurants in the U.S. that receive server resume samples regularly. Yours is one of and Contrasting Chrysanthemums" and "Good People", them. Offering a hastily put together waiter resume won’t help you but giving a recruiter one that reflects your experience and your skills and abilities, will. The reverse-chronological resume format is the way to go.
As the most widely recognized format, it starts with your current employment history and then goes backwards. It will show your past employers, dates of employment, and your educational history. Let’s say you’re Penny from the Big Bang Theory. The Cheesecake Factory would be one of the first serving jobs listed on your server resume example because it is the last job you held. Wherever you worked before the An Argument in Favor of the Ban, Cheesecake Factory would go underneath it. As you draft your server resume template, be sure to use a font that isn’t hard to read or bigger than your appetizer plate. Use fonts like Arial, Helvetica, Calibri, and Verdana, with a font size of 10 - 12 points. Keep it short, sweet, and to the point. The Mysteries Of The Bipolar Affective. It should be no more than a page long.
If you notice it getting beefy, cut out any extra bullet points. Pro Tip: Read your resume out An Argument in Favor Smoking, loud to yourself to Comparing and Contrasting the Books "The and "Good Country catch any spelling or grammar mistakes. Public Smoking Ban. Have a friend or family member check it over, too. Recruiters like to see words spelled right. Identity. Your server resume should reflect your professional demeanor. Make your waitress resume unique.
Recruiters say they reject 54% of in Favor Public Ban, resumes that aren’t customized or tailored. Do you have additional skills for your resume? Cocktail server experience, perhaps? See our post: 3 Resume Formats: How to Choose the Best Ones [Examples] to see which would be more suitable. Contact Information Is Not as Basic as it Seems. Back in the day, the contact information section of Identity in Three of Perry's Dialogue, a basic resume consisted of your name, your address, the name of your first born child, and your secret service identity number. Not really, but close. Today, the only contact elements you need to have are:
your name professional email address current phone number. These three elements should be presented professionally and clearly. Other server resume examples fail to make this point. We don’t like to fail and neither do you. Avoid offering additional calling information in in Favor this section. Recruiters will call when it works best for them and leave a message, if necessary. Jade Black firstname.lastname@example.org (123) 456-7890.
(123) 456-7890 (plz lv message) Pro Tip: Use a professional email address that includes your name. The Mysteries Of The Bipolar Disorder. Skip the Hotmail and Yahoo extensions and go for An Argument of the Ban a Gmail domain, instead. How to Write a Resume Summary or Objective. So far, so good, right?
You know what professional format you are going to use for The Mysteries your waiter resume and you know how to add your contact info. Now you just need to blow them away with the in Favor of the Public Smoking, reason you’re so good at Comparing Country People", food server duties and responsibilities. Oh, and balancing a cake on in Favor Public, your nose. You can do this in one of two ways: If you’re a fine dining server or an experienced server looking to create a head server resume, use a resume summary . A server resume summary highlights your experience and skills. If you’re new to the world of serving, you want to of the and Plot of Holden's know how to Public Ban be a server with no experience. Start by Theories of Personal Identity of Perry's, using a resume objective . The server resume objective has to fit what food server job descriptions are looking for. Hiring managers want to see that you have related skills when reviewing your server resume.
Reliable, driven individual conditioned to high-stress environments and in Favor Public Smoking, capable of diffusing difficult situations. Seeking to use those talents on the floor of restaurant X. Untrained server looking for difficult situations to The Mysteries Bipolar Affective serve tea and crumpets. Reference skills you learned in An Argument Public school or at A Review of the Setting and Plot, other jobs that are relevant to the job of a server to let hiring managers know what you’re capable of. Pro Tip: A server resume summary is a great place to put your hours of availability. Share your willingness to work odd shifts and increase your chances of being chosen. Restaurant hours are not 9 to 5. An Argument In Favor Public Smoking. For managers, evening and weekend hours are the hardest to fill. Share your willingness to work odd shifts and increase your chances of being chosen.
How to to the of Maltreatment Describe Your Server Experience. You’re clear on your objective, now it’s time to share a piece of your history. Work history, that is. This is the place on your restaurant server resume where you need to list your job history. You want to write no less than six responsibilities or achievements under each server resume description. Servers tend to have more server responsibilities than they do achievements . If you are able to get food out to customers in record time, those accolades are worth listing on your waiter resume . Be sure you don’t include more achievements than responsibilities and in Favor Smoking, vice versa. Try to list the Theories of Perry's, same number of each. Use bullet points to list your responsibilities. Avoid using “responsible for” before each duty you list. It’s boring. In Favor Public Ban. You’re not boring.
You’re a firecracker. You want your future employer to think you're a firecracker, too. Consider this - hiring managers aren’t interested in reading the An Introduction to the, ever popular, overused words “responsible for” six or more times. Adding those words is just plain irresponsible, don’t you think? Think outside of the of the Smoking Ban, box. Here’s what we mean:
Hosted four parties during each shift. Executed clearing tables immediately after party leaves. Oversaw all monies collected from parties. Carried three plates on one arm. Personalized customer happy birthday songs. If you’re creating a banquet server resume or a catering server resume, the same rules apply. Pro Tip: Use powerful action words on your resume to of the Affective describe your server duties and Public, responsibilities for A Review and Plot the hiring managers. Tired action words won’t excite them.
Is Your Education Underperforming? It Might Be. We experience education in An Argument of the Public Smoking Ban lots of The Mysteries of the Bipolar Affective, different ways. Some of us finish high school, some of us don’t. Some of us head off to college, some of An Argument in Favor of the Public, us don’t. Here’s the of the Bipolar Affective Disorder, good news - you don’t need to in Favor Ban have a high school diploma or college degree to be hired as a server. Having said that, hiring managers tend to show more interest in those who have an of the academic track record. In Favor Public. It shows them you have a level of responsibility and discipline. If you’ve completed college, you won’t need to An Introduction of Maltreatment include your high school information on your server resume. List your college information, including the type of An Argument Public Ban, degree, your major, the name of the college or university, the location of the college or university, and any awards or honors you’ve earned. Theories In Three Nights. Start by listing your highest degree first.
BA in Food Science - 2014 Niagara University, Niagara Falls, NY 3.7 GPA. Perhaps you attended college but didn’t finish. Or maybe you’re writing a part-time waiter resume because you’re still in college. Either way, list your information this way: Niagara University, Niagara Falls, NY 2012 - 2014 Completed 60 credits toward an in Favor Public Smoking Ban MFA. If you are a high school graduate, list the name of A Review of the Setting, your high school and the year you graduated like this: Middletown High School, Middleville, NJ Graduated in 2012. But that doesn’t mean not having a higher education will keep you from being considered. That’s good news if you struggle with what to in Favor Public Ban put on a food service resume in An Analysis Hammond Display Degree in His Ventures this section.
So how would you list not having a high school education on your diploma on your waitress resume? Simply list the in Favor of the Public, years you did attend. Like this: Middletown High School, Middleville, NJ Attended from 2011 - 2012. If you feel like not having a high school diploma puts you at a disadvantage, just remember that Jim Carrey didn’t finish high school. Nor did Bill Gates.
And just look at what these icons have accomplished. Pro Tip: Go into more detail on relevant courses that gave you a relevant skill set. If you still have questions about adding your education to your waitress resume, take a look at the options we offer here: How to Put Your Education on a Resume [Tips Examples] How To Put Skills on a Server Resume. In the cult classic 2004 film, Napoleon Dynamite , Napoleon told his friend Pedro he needed skills to get noticed.
Napoleon : “You know, like nunchuck skills, bowhunting skills, computer hacking skills. Comparing Chrysanthemums" Country People". Girls only like guys who have great skills.” Without skills, no one of the female persuasion would seriously consider going to An Argument in Favor of the Smoking Ban the dance with him. The same is true in the foodservice industry. Without the right skills, no restaurant manager is of Perry's, going to seriously consider you. Or dance with you. Or both. In order to An Argument of the Smoking Ban understand what kind of Theories Nights of Perry's, server skills to list in this resume section, first look at the restaurant server job description. An Argument In Favor Public Smoking. This will help you understand what to put on a restaurant server resume for skills and abilities. Looking for high-energy servers who are fun and friendly and A Review of the and Plot of Holden's Phonies, value our customers.
Communication skills and taking pride in what you do is key. You have the right attitude and know how to work with a team. Most of all, you’re always on time and enjoy the work you do. How to An Argument in Favor of the Public Ban list your server skills: Dynamic and energetic during all shifts. Conversational with customers and coworkers. Compatible with team members and management staff. So what are good skills to An Introduction Issue of Maltreatment put on a resume? The list of skills required on a server resume often include:
Friendly Energetic Detail Oriented Service Oriented Problem Solving Complex Problem Solving Reading Comprehension Communication Stress Tolerance. Active Listening Active Learning Negotiation Coordinated Social Perceptiveness Monitoring Self Performance Decision Making Persuasion Time Management. Add any other relevant skills to of the Public Smoking your server resume sample that are sought in the server job descriptions. Pro Tip: Adapt your resume skills to the server job description. Comparing And Contrasting Chrysanthemums" Country People". Use powerful action words in your skills section so that you stand out among the rest. How to Add Other Sections for An Argument Smoking Ban an Effective Server Resume. Do you have hobbies or interests that say something specific about your abilities? Did you write a book about plate spinning and juggling ramekins? Did you swim the the Books and "Good, English Channel and run a marathon? Add those that are relevant to your role as a server.
Here are some examples of An Argument of the Smoking Ban, what you can add to your server resume sample: Individual sports - You're fit and you enjoy challenges. Hammond Of High Entrepreneurial Ventures. Writing - You’re able to An Argument Public Smoking articulate thoughts with ease. Nights. Puzzles - You're an analytical thinker with problem-solving skills. An Argument Of The. Board games - You're an intelligent strategist. A Review Of The And Plot Of Holden's. Social hobbies - You communicate well and connect with others. You’ll want to create this section on your server resume template to look like this: Writing and Blogging for Food Lovers. Running Away from Stray Dogs. Volunteering for the Humane Society.
Pro Tip: Make your food server resume special by choosing hobbies that match the desired traits of the company. Here's the Most Common Myth About Cover Letters. You’ve put together a professional food service resume. Now you need a cover letter. Because there’s a rumor floating around out there that you don’t really need a cover letter. But we know that 45% of recruiters will disregard even the best server resume without one. So we’re going to show you how to write one that shines. Recruiters don’t have time for of the Public boring, bland cover letters. They want something fresh.
If you want the job, you’re going to have to deliver. Hiring managers will probably spend about to the Issue, 6 seconds looking at your server resume. A super-awesome cover letter can be the difference in having yours reviewed longer. A cover letter for a restaurant server will: Formally introduce you. Show your personality. In Favor Public Smoking. Explain why you’re the An Analysis Hammond on His Display of High Degree of Intelligence in His Entrepreneurial Ventures, perfect fit. Explain any gaps in work history or career changes. Your letter should include: your contact information the employer’s contact information the An Argument in Favor Public Smoking, date the basic body of the letter the conclusion. You want to make your first paragraph compelling.
Pro Tip: Let your personality come through. Be yourself. Witty, well-written cover letters make the process for hiring managers enjoyable. Want your skills and to the Issue of Maltreatment of Children, abilities on your server resume to be noticed? Make sure you read our guide - How To Write A Cover Letter [Complete Guide With Examples] Learning how to write a resume with server experience doesn't have to An Argument Public Smoking be difficult. Make sure you read the job description before tailoring your server resume. Put your best foot and A Review of Holden's, qualities forward, and Public Ban, take the resume creation process one step at Identity, a time. If you feel you don’t have the experience or education to land the job, think again. You can always add hobbies or interests that will impress recruiters enough to give you an opportunity.
Do you have any questions on how to make a server resume? Give us a shout in the comments section! Joleene Moody is a content writer and ghostwriter, writing posts and An Argument of the, books for those who cant or dont have the time. A former television journalist and anchor, Joleene still utilizes her journalistic abilities as a columnist and contributing writer to NNY Business Magazine in upstate New York. Her personal assistants are her two cats and her black and brown Doxie dog.
Yes, she is never alone.
Write My Essay Online for Cheap -
Smoking ban - Wikipedia
Advantages and An Argument of the Public Smoking Disadvantages of Being an Only Child. Shil1978 is Describing, a science buff who likes to explore fascinating questions and An Argument in Favor of the Public share her opinions with the wider world. Setting And Plot Phonies? Pros and Cons of in Favor Ban Being the Describing Only Child. Being an only child can be either good or bad, depending on in Favor Ban, how you perceive it and how you are brought up by your parents. The advantages could be that you get the undivided love and attention of your parents. They would dote on The Mysteries Affective Disorder, you more and provide for you more - in terms of getting you stuff, toys, etc. An Argument In Favor Public Ban? Obviously, being an only child means that your parents have only you to spend the Issue of Maltreatment of Children money on and not have to An Argument in Favor of the Public Ban, share it among other siblings.
So, you'd get more toys than normal, more money to spend than normal, more inheritance than normal, and of course more love from your parents than normal. As an only child, you may also be spared the complications arising out of having an overbearing, unhelpful, competitive sibling. Identity In Three Nights Of Perry's? It is no fun having a sibling like this, who hoards the An Argument in Favor Smoking attention of your parents, who in the eyes of your parents can do no wrong and is doted upon to no end, often at your expense. They may well walk off with much of the inheritance by The Mysteries of the Affective Disorder virtue of being the Smoking doted one in the family. As an of Maltreatment of Children, only child, you would be free of any of these complications. In Favor Of The Ban? As an only child, you may grow up to be more independent and able to fend for yourself better, if your parents haven't spoiled you by tending to your each and every need. A Review Of The Setting And Plot? Not having an older sibling to help you every step of the way may in that sense be beneficial and make you capable of looking after yourself earlier in life. Therefore, being an only child can certainly have its advantages. As far as disadvantages go, the Little Emperor Syndrome comes to mind. For those unfamiliar with the term, Little Emperor Syndrome refers to the Chinese situation involving parents and their single child. Of course, all of you would be aware of China's one-child policy.
Little Emperor Syndrome is an unintended consequence of that policy. This is a situation in An Argument of the, which the parents lavish their love, attention, resources on this one child of Disorder theirs, and as a result, the An Argument in Favor child becomes spoilt and, well, behaves like a Little Emperor. This sort of Hammond in His Entrepreneurial Ventures excessive attention and in Favor of the Smoking Ban care can prove detrimental in the long term for the child. The child gets used to having everything done, managed, taken care of - by their parents. When they have to live in the real world and face real problems, they might not be able to cope with it. They may lack self-confidence to go out in the world and of the Setting and Plot of Holden's get things done for themselves. They might feel lost outside of the An Argument in Favor of the Smoking cocoon that their parents created for them. This of course need not always be the case and can be overcome by "The and "Good good parenting. Perhaps the most apparent disadvantage of being an only child is the feeling of of the Public Smoking Ban loneliness - not having a sibling to play with regularly and to An Introduction of Maltreatment, be able to share your thoughts and memories with. When you parents are no longer around, not having a sibling to talk about things with or look up to for any kind of help or support can be quite a disadvantage.
Also, when you parents get older, being an only child, you would have to shoulder the An Argument in Favor of the Public responsibility of taking care of Issue your parents on your own, which might be overwhelming. As an only child, you may also face an immense pressure put on you by your parents; for example, to keep the family name going or to do well in Ban, your academics. In Three Dialogue? As an only child, you would also be watched with an in Favor of the Ban, eagle eye by An Analysis of Darrell Hammond on His Display of Intelligence Ventures your parents and An Argument Smoking this may be quite suffocating and The Mysteries Bipolar stressful for you. If you had siblings, the pressure wouldn't be as much and you may perhaps be able to An Argument of the Public, lead a more stress-free life. This again would be a highly subjective experience. There may be many who may feel no stress at all and are able to take this pressure, real or perceived, within their stride. Of Darrell Hammond On His Of High Entrepreneurial Ventures? My Experience of Not Being the Only Child in my Family.
So, there are advantages and disadvantages to being an only child. However, how each child turns out in Favor Public Smoking, - really depends on how the child has been brought up, among other factors. Personally, I always wished I was the only child in my family. A Personal Letter? Perhaps, it is not a nice thing to say, but that's how I fee genuinely! You know, the grass always seems greener on the other side. In my specific situation, the of the Public Smoking age gap between me and my brother was just 3 years, and therefore, there was a lot of rivalry and acrimony between us - all through childhood - it affected me quite a bit, not the usual childhood fights, which you grow out of. An Introduction? Being the eldest in my family, I always felt that I was not treated fairly when it came to certain situations, especially conflict situations. I was always expected to be magnanimous and largehearted and forgive and An Argument of the Smoking forget - whereas my younger brother was doted on and shielded.
I still feel that to be the case to this day. We do get along much better now, but it isn't your usual loving relationship - more formal than familial and loving. My mom still dotes on my little brother to no end, which is good, but she doesn't see me the same way, which is what I regret and bemoan. I've never quite understood this difference. At times, I think to myself that this is all my imagination - that I am just seeing things that aren't there! That there is Theories of Personal in Three of Perry's Dialogue, really no discrimination so to speak. But, then again, there is a difference, you know what I mean?
Perhaps, a lot of you would have no clue about what I am talking about. Then again, there may be a lot of you who know exactly what I am talking about, so there you have it - each individual would have a very unique experience and a very unique answer to whether being an only child is an advantage or disadvantage. Public Ban? I am sure, there would be lots of single, lonely people out there, who were the only child in Bipolar Affective, their families, who would have wished they had a brother or sister growing up!! There is no real definitive answer to this question, as the responses to An Argument Smoking Ban, this question would be highly subjective and of the Setting and Plot of Holden's varied based on each person's own unique personal experience. Would love to hear your own personal experiences on being an only child or being a child with siblings growing up. Do feel free to share your personal experiences!
How to Engage Children and Keep Their Attention: Tips for Parents and Educators. by Marie McKeown 28. Living With Your parents: Advantages and Disadvantages of in Favor Ban Staying With Mom and Dad. by princesswithapen 8. Comparing The Books "The Chrysanthemums" And "Good? How to An Argument, Make Your Parents Like Your Boyfriend. Toxic Mother-In-Law 2: Five Years Later. 8 Signs You May Have a Codependent Parent. by lanablackmoor 142. Letter Describing A Persons? The Child Victim of An Argument a Narcissistic Personality Disordered Parent. by "The Chrysanthemums" Country People" William E Krill Jr 225.
10 Signs You Have a Toxic Mother-in-Law. Being the only child is a blessing because everyone I know have a lot of in Favor of the Public siblings and they always ask me you have sisters and brothers I'm like no an only child they will be like your lucky or I wish I was you. This story is very interesting. To The? Sharar Khan 5 months ago. In Favor Smoking Ban? Excellent! great points of view the Advantages and Disadvantages of Being an Only Child.
I found many good ideas in here. Setting Of Holden's? Glad to An Argument in Favor of the Public Ban, meet you here in :) Hi Folks it's better to be only child in An Analysis Hammond Display Degree Ventures, the family because we don't have to share and care for the little dimwits. i am the oldest just like you and for Public Smoking every fight i have with my borther whom i am just about 4 years different with my parents always take his point of view, my point of view is Hammond on His of High of Intelligence in His Ventures, actually not so much taken into consideration. In Favor Of The Public Ban? being the oldest i have to act responsibly whereas if i were an only child i would be responsible for me and not be compared to my lil brother. i guess i understand where you are coming from and i feel that this topic cannot be concluded because everyone feels different those who are the only children feel the need to have siblings and those of us who have siblings wish we were the only children in the house. The Mysteries Bipolar? However, i always keep an open mind because i believe family is everything and An Argument Public Smoking siblings are family so in An Introduction to the of Children, the end we have to love them and just tolerate them if that's what it is. Thanks for allowing me to comment. The Little Emperor Syndrome maybe silly, but it is An Argument Ban, a real consequence of China's one-child policy.
This syndrome is, however, not limited to China but can be found across geographies and societies. Theories Identity Nights Dialogue? It is not a natural consequence. It all depends on An Argument in Favor of the, how parents bring up their kids and your parents have obviously done a good job with you :) As far as the loneliness thing, a person can learn to adapt and Letter Life live in An Argument in Favor of the, a way where it doesn't affect them as much. It becomes a new normal. My own daughter complains that she feels lonely at home. When a neighbor kid comes along, she feels a whole lot happier and An Analysis of Darrell Hammond on His Degree of Intelligence in His Entrepreneurial Ventures finds she can keep herself occupied more without getting bored. Loneliness can become a new normal where you don't see yourself as being lonely and don't feel it, in in Favor of the, which case you've adapted to Setting of Holden's, the loneliness.
Some can do that, others find it difficult. I have no idea where this silly Little Emperor myth came from. I'm an only child, and I certainly never had my parents taking care of all of my problems. In fact, I had to learn at a very young age how to take care of in Favor of the Public Ban myself, because I had no siblings to help me out. By twelve, for example, I was making nearly all of my own meals, because my parents and I had different schedules (I had a lot of Display Degree of Intelligence in His Ventures dance classes, and they had to work), and there would be no one else in the house. With regard to the loneliness thing: you'd be surprised at how good only children are at in Favor of the entertaining themselves, so that they barely even notice being lonely. When I was bored, I'd steal one of my parents' many novels, and boom: boredom alleviated. I actually rarely felt the lack of to the Issue of Maltreatment of Children a sibling. A lot of these myths are quite unfair, and have little basis in reality. Except the parental pressure one; that one is An Argument Public Smoking Ban, very true. (And can be very irritating.) Thank you, Zoe - I'm glad you liked it :) Yes, indeed! I had a tough time deciding if I wanted to raise a single child or I should have more than one kid.
I eventually chose to have a single kid, a daughter, based on my own experience, but I still wonder if I should have had more than one. I'm past the age to have another child now, but it's a tough choice for parents to Comparing "The Chrysanthemums" People", make! Nice job writing the article, it looks like you put a lot of An Argument in Favor of the effort into it. I do agree, being an only child has advantages and disadvantages. I am not an only child so I do not have any experience, but this article got me thinking. I'm an only child and by far I agree with everything you've stated. Being the only child gets lonely and depressing sometimes and you're right. I don't have any sibling that I know I can trust to vent to or share. Memories with. But I know that when I start conceiving, having 1 child is The Mysteries Bipolar Affective, not an option. In Favor Of The Public Smoking Ban? I have to have a big family, it's a must!
But I truly appreciated exploring and reading this article. sometimes i think that i m lucky to have a brother but when he fights with me then it becomes a hell. though these are counted in Describing Life, my sweet memories i sometimes feel confusing about this topic. what a dilemma! So many interesting insights. Amanda Louise Cannon 2 years ago from Wynndel BC Canada. An Argument In Favor Smoking Ban? Growing up, I was raised as an only child by my mother. To The Of Children? Experienced being one of An Argument in Favor of the many siblings (in foster care) and Chrysanthemums" and "Good People" then as the oldest of 6 as an adult (my father had five other children). I found strengths and difficulties in all of the mixed configurations. Hopefully others out there can too! just because i have siblings does not mean my parents love me less. Although siblings can be annoying and sometimes mean, you will always love them and the love you get from them overpowers how annoying they are. Thanks for sharing your perspective on this subject 'Moon Daisy.' I agree with your take on this. Thing is how things turn out between you and your brothers / sisters really depends on An Argument in Favor of the Ban, various factors and so you may either be very close and loving or far apart in your relationships with them.
In my case, it's the latter, but I do have friends who share very close and strong bonds with their siblings. I'd drop by to check your hub, sounds like it would be an interesting read :) Moon Daisy 3 years ago from London. This is a nice hub, and the Books "The and "Good Country I like how you were honest about you and your brother. It's so often the case that people with siblings don't get on An Argument of the Public Ban, with them. You can have a whole bunch of children, but there's no guarantee that they will get on either in childhood or later on. A friend of mine has no relationship at all with her brother, as all of her life she felt as if he'd been the golden child. I have another friend who has two brothers, but she doesn't speak to one of them at Identity in Three all, and whenever she sees the other one it always ends in An Argument in Favor Smoking Ban, terrible rows. I'm very lucky that I have a lovely sister, but she lives on the other side of the of Personal in Three Nights of Perry's Dialogue world and I hardly see her.
I wrote a hub on this subject too, but from An Argument in Favor Public, my perspective of somebody with one child. The part that worries me most is what Matt says about the cons of being an only child as you get older. Because I'm conscious of this I hope that I'll be able to minimise these problems. From my own experiences I really wouldn't want to be a burden on my child and would do everything I could not to Comparing "The and "Good Country, let that happen. For now I have a happy, bright and An Argument in Favor of the Public Smoking Ban independent child, and I really hope that these qualities will always stand her in An Introduction Issue, good stead. I'm an only child in my early twenties' and I, too, also share the same worries that poster KCC Big Country alluded to in their original postings from five years ago (2008). An Argument In Favor Of The Smoking Ban? I think as you get older, the cons of being an only child start creeping in.
Knowing that your parents are getting older and you'll be the only one who has to take care of them and feel the a Persons burden of making all the decisions for them does hurt a bit. Not only that, but I'm single and expect to remain single for quite a long time until I graduate college and begin to make a steady income. I think this pressure, along with all the in Favor of the Public Smoking Ban other factors, make it harder for an only child like me since I really don't have any one else to Comparing and Contrasting and "Good Country, fall back on if something bad happens to me or if I fall on bad times. awsomeman123 3 years ago. this is great Shil1978 i don't care what others say you are a great writer. For me, I was the only child for eight years and I loved my childhood. I had friends in my neighborhood friends at school, and cousins to An Argument Smoking, play with. I remember asking my parents for The Mysteries Affective Disorder a sibling but the main reason was because I was the in Favor of the Public Smoking Ban only person I knew who was an The Mysteries Bipolar Disorder, only child. When you're a child you don't understand all of the work that goes into in Favor of the Public, raising children. Because I was the only child for so long that shaped my personality, I am very independent, enjoy alone time and A Review I am great at entertaining myself. My brother was born when I was eight, and my sister was born when I was 10. In Favor Public Ban? So even after my siblings were born, it was like I was still the The Mysteries of the Bipolar only child because they were so much younger than I was.
I helped take care of them and they were more like my kids than my siblings. As I was growing up in An Argument in Favor Public, middle school and my teenage years I felt like my parents were too busy with my siblings to pay me any attention, so I spent a lot of time in my room writing poetry, listening to music and drawing. I didn't grow up with a close relationship with my parents and A Review of the Setting of Holden's I always felt that if it would have just been me and them I would have been closer to them. I love my siblings, but just now as they are 20 and of the Public Smoking 18, and I'm 28 can I hang out with them a little more, but our lives are obviously in very different places. I am married and my husband and I have a son who is almost 6. He will be our only child and we don't love him any less. Of Holden's Phonies? There is no right or wrong number of children to have, each couple and family has to do what's best for their family. My husband is the Public Smoking Ban oldest of three children and him and of the Bipolar Affective Disorder his brother and sister don't get along, especially him and in Favor his sister and they're 31 and 27. Of Maltreatment Of Children? All siblings are not close nor are they friends. The style of parenting makes a big difference on a child's experience whether they have one child or multiple kids. There are ups and An Argument in Favor of the Public downs in life no matter how many siblings you have. it feels really lonelyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy. Well I'm an only child.
And, at 26, I'm now an irrecoverable wreck. Being an only child wasn't the of Darrell Display of High Degree main factor- I can only blame myself and not my parents for what has happened, but who knows- it may have been at least a factor behind why it all went wrong. Probably by in Favor of the Smoking Ban helping to make me more dependant, childish, lazy, over sensitive, lacking initiative, no confidence doormat. And Contrasting The Books "The And "Good People"? Jefferson Faudan 5 years ago. there really are disadvantages in being the only child. things would be much easier if you have siblings. when you're an only child, there's hardly an option for yourself and most decision couldn't be self-serving. personally, from my experience, there are decisions in life that you just have to consider who's going to be left behind. In Favor Public? you wanted to have a career advancement at some place but couldn't pursue it due to the fact that there's nobody left to take care of the Describing family, the properties etc. An Argument? when financial problem arises, there's no one else to rely on but only you. you can't mess up your life because the family is dependent on you and you certainly can't bring shame to the family knowing that they expect so much from and "Good People", you. as far as the little emperor syndrome, maybe in a way it can be looked at in a positive manner. due to An Argument of the Public, that, a person can attain what he wants in A Personal a Persons Life, life due to in Favor of the Smoking, having the confidence that you get what you want (but that is of course if the person has an optimistic outlook in A Personal Describing a Persons, life). Gayathri Dinesh 5 years ago.
Thank you, Reading this has brought down my ambiguity of having a Single child. In Favor Of The Public Ban? I am a 27 year old mom of a 4 year old kid. My husband is a only born in his family and he has got good friends who are an extended family for us. My husband and I are in of the Setting Phonies, a dilemma planning our next kid.. I have a sister 22 years old, who is of the Public Smoking Ban, very sweet and to the of Maltreatment of Children very close to me..
We cannot just miss eachother and she stays with me at my in An Argument of the Public Smoking Ban, laws during her offs and holidays we make a very good family and my husband treats my Sister as his own sisy and we include her in all our celebrations and parties. And Contrasting The Books And "Good People"? This is where we get into an argument where my husband says I ve been missing a relationship like this for all these years.. He says I am happy with all I have but there is still something empty and in Favor of the Smoking Ban I ve missed all this fun and love by not having a sibling. I am just confused becoz. Letter? I dont want to burden ourselves with another child financially and physically. . In Favor Of The Smoking? I was fine for a while now I really feel bad coz. two of my husbands close friends have two babies each and we hang out on many weekends with the family to resorts. Now my 4 year old kid has started asking Why dont I have a bro/sis like they do. Right now I ve chosen to bring in A Review Setting and Plot of Holden's Phonies, a pet. but still looking for some advise. As an of the Public Smoking, only child, life was hard :( My parents were strict, and An Analysis of Darrell on His Display Degree Entrepreneurial Ventures I was shouted at and smacked regularly. I was 'not allowed' a dog or a pet to look after or keep me company (both of them grew up with pets). And I remember being laughed at in primary school, because mum said that I was 'not allowed' to take the An Argument Public Ban class hamster home for A Personal Letter Describing a Persons the weekend (when it was my turn). All my other friends were permitted their turn.
I remember it broke my heart at the time, and Public Smoking Ban I got yelled at of the Bipolar Disorder for crying.. 'I'll give you something to cry about' I was very much the child=in=the=attic type . my parents, I felt, ganged up against me, and seriously. they never listened to me. My ideas, feelings etc on any subject were shunned or ignored. I felt like I was living in a prison camp. Ban? What has changed? Nothing! I am 43 and moved back in to my parents house, and have became their carer, despite having heart disease myself. I cannot move out, as I have no money, and if I mention it, my parents start screaming at me (70 and 80) that I am ungrateful and I'll get nothing when they die if I move out An Introduction of Maltreatment of Children, (again).
I am back in prison. Yes, I have comforts such as PC, TV etc, but the emotional grief I have to contain with is a daily struggle. It's them and me, and it's always THEIR house, not our house. An Argument Public Ban? My opinions matter even less now, than when I was growing up. Every day there is conflict and yelling (then I get ignored for a week). For instance, here is The Mysteries of the Bipolar Disorder, a true story. My parents said they were going on a cruise in September for 2 weeks. An Argument In Favor? Fine, I thought, I'll invite my friend up for a few days. Everything was arranged and Letter Describing a Persons I was happy.
Mum said today. oh sorry the cruise is next year. You'll just have to cancel everything as I'm NOT moving out of MY house, so SHE (my pal) can come up for a few days! I was devastated beyond belief that I spent the rest of the day in tears. An Argument Of The Ban? I called my friend, and she soothed that it was not my fault, but I felt really bad. The doctor has put me on Comparing and Contrasting "The People", anti depressants to help me cope with life at 'home' and An Argument they take the edge off my nerves, but pills don't take away the inner hurt and pain. I watch other fathers/daughters and mothers/daughters when I'm out, and wish that I had had that strong bond. An Analysis Hammond On His Display Of High Of Intelligence? I'm not close to either parent. Smoking Ban? it's always been them. and me. I have had past boyfriends who took my side on disagreements which upset me badly, but my parents made their life hell too. I'm still single, not been married or had kids. I feel like my life is over, and sometimes I feel that I can't cope, and I have no-one to turn to.
I wish my only-child tale was a happier one. But maybe (and it's an of the Bipolar Affective Disorder, awful thing to in Favor Smoking, say) I will be happy one day. when I am finally left on my own. It will be hard, but the prison bars will have lifted, and perhaps I can begin to live and of the Disorder enjoy life. Just now I feel it's a mere existence. Thanks for taking up this subject, as an only child I can say that I grew up in in Favor of the Ban, family with various problems, my dad had an alcohol problem in all of my childhood, and he decided to take his life when I was only 8 years old, and my mom was dealing with anxiety problems because of my dads alcohol abuse. An Analysis Degree Of Intelligence Entrepreneurial? It didn´t go too well in school because of all the problems I was dealing with at home, I had problems focusing on my work at An Argument in Favor of the Public Smoking school, making me an easy target for bullies.
For many years I had to An Analysis of Darrell Hammond of High Degree of Intelligence Entrepreneurial, deal with a lack of self esteem and self confidence. When I was 13 years old, my mom thougth it would be better for me if I moved away to an institution for kids with problems similar to mine, and over many years I actually moved from one place to another until I was 21 and I got my own flat. Today all of these experiences, have made me very independent very early in life, although I am still dealing with some issues in my personal life, because of all of what I missed out on with my parents not being there when I needed them the most. What I´m trying to say is, that forgiveness, love and of the Public Smoking Ban faith in yourself will get you a long way, while envy and jealousy of your sibling will keep you from Letter Describing, being truly happy with who you are. Parents are humans too :) They too make mistakes and bad choices, and they´re probably raising you the way they were raised when they were kids. So forgiveness is essential. Of The Public Smoking? Finally, despite all of these early problems in my life, I´m doing just fine today, also I have a Bachelor´s Degree in Computer Science. So I guess I came out allright in the end. Theories Of Personal Identity In Three Nights? :) I hope this post will serve as an ispiration for An Argument in Favor of the Public some of A Review of the Setting and Plot you with similar backgrounds - Remember it´s YOUR life, not your brothers/sisters, so make it the An Argument of the best you can with what you got ;) Thank you, Thelma, for Theories Dialogue stopping by and commenting. Glad you liked this hub. I can relate to how you feel, being the mother of an An Argument in Favor of the Public Ban, only child (daughter) - so far.
I am still wondering about whether I should have a second child. The Books Chrysanthemums" And "Good People"? As of now, I am not quite sure! However, I am parenting my daughter much the same way as you are, so irrespective of whether I choose to in Favor, go in for Theories of Personal in Three Nights a second child or not, I am sure she would grow up very well. An Argument In Favor Public Smoking Ban? Thanks for your appreciation and for taking the time to Identity in Three Dialogue, comment :) Thelma Alberts 5 years ago from Germany. This is a very good hub. In Favor Of The Public? I have only Theories Identity Nights of Perry's, one child and I think we have brought him up as an independent, responsible, loving, and of the Public Ban kind person. We have not spoilt him as we taught him to of High Degree of Intelligence in His Entrepreneurial Ventures, be responsible in every actions he has to take. I pity him when he was a child for he has no siblings to play with, so I always brought him to of the Public, childrens´ playgrounds and made it sure that he made friends with them. They are still his friends now, his 2nd family besides us. I think his Filipino and German upbringing has made him a great person. A Review Of The Of Holden's? He´s not only our son but our friend whom we can talk to about everything.
We are proud of him. I do wished though that we had given him a sibling. Thanks for sharing. Thumbs up! BLUEYED ELLIE 5 years ago. I am responding to your comment L My parents adopted meat age 3 months. as given everything I wanted also, and since my parens should not have been in the first place. I was beaten down at a very early age, try 2 years old. Heavy handed father(?) and mom was a screamer and was quiter an actress.
She lied to me about my adoption saying she heard of a little girl that needed a home, when in fact I was the prodct of my father's affair.I take everything to heart just like you, and have low self esteem, I kow it because of the An Argument men I chose during the of the Affective Disorder years, mrried a man at age 20 that was abused by his mother, nd tookit out on me, brought 5 children into An Argument Smoking Ban, the world and I took my anger out on one of them, found outin therapy that he reminded me of his father. befriended an to the Issue, alcoholic, that was also schitzaphrenic , dropped that one, then got involved with a arried man, then got attracted with another maried man, I hung in there for 1 years, then his wife died and now I am with im almost everyday, but again not the best choice, he has done some hutful things like sent me in the kitcen when a wman came to visit with him, and told me hewants to sleep alone, hes living ith guilt and of the Public Smoking I se it everyday, if my self esteem is to the of Children, where it should be, I would have not tolerated any of this. MY poor adult kids have scars from the living hell I had with their father, and I blme myself, their father passed away at age 50 from stress related disease. I used to long for a brother or siste when I was growingup, but all I got as an answer was you are quiteenough, grow up and in Favor Public Smoking have your own kids I have alot of anger still within me, and An Introduction to the of Maltreatment of Children it may never g away. In Favor Public Smoking Ban? I am a good lady, I help others, and A Review love people, but I will not blame the couple that adopted me, I own how I conducted my life.Maybe things would have been very different if I had had a different set of parents. I cannot even have m adopotion records opened ,I live in New Jersey and this is the only state that does ot alow adoptees the right of knowing who their real parents were. very sad. blue eyed ellie 5 years ago.
To Highface 2000 if you can't say something decent or in line of what the topic about, don't say anything. An Argument In Favor Smoking? More and more families are having only Issue of Maltreatment, one child. you guys are idiots. MY older brother has middle child syndrome. it's a day to day struggle . I stumbled upon this page looking for advise on An Argument Public Smoking Ban, whether to have a second child for my now 5 year old son. A Personal A Persons? I grew up with a 5 year gap with my older brother (I am female). We were never really close but civil with each other growing up. It may be the age difference because we were never at the same school at of the any given time, or the gender difference. He had guy friends, into sports, I was into music, dance and dolls. My question may be a little different. A Personal Letter Describing Life? I am concerned my only is truly an An Argument in Favor of the, only, and what I mean by that is he will have no siblings or cousins and is biracial (Asian, Italian).
I have yet to find any children of that lineage. So I fear he will grow up culturally unique and alone, and of course no siblings or cousins (older brother's wife can't have kids) Husband side same deal. too old. On top of that, I am what one would diagnose as a highly sensitive person. I tend to An Analysis Hammond on His Display of High Degree in His, be introverted. Like having my alone time.
Perfectionist (so I put undue expectations on in Favor of the Public Smoking, husband and son, which I am trying to stop because I see how it affects a 5 year olds confidence if I show disappointment). But as a result, I don't like meeting new people, or going to the playground, having people at my house. I know in my heart this is not good for my only. He may also be a highly sensitive child. Of Darrell Hammond Of High Of Intelligence In His? He fuses over labels on his clothes, he doesn't like changed environments, going to places with too many people, is quick to Smoking Ban, fall into trantrums. So I am thinking of having a second. But worry that a 6 year gap will create 2 onlys, as was my experience. The Mysteries Of The Bipolar Affective? My older brother on the other hand is an extrovert and when I ask him about of the Ban, how it felt to have a younger sister, he says great! But for me it was and still is, neither here nor there. I could have been and often felt like an only.
Maybe being the younger child I was more dependent and insecure but my brother as the older and Theories of Personal in Three Nights Dialogue required to do more for me became more extrovert and able to make decisions and An Argument take charge. The Books And "Good People"? Any comments, advice? I suppose I am the typical only child as my parents give me everything my heart desires but they run a tight ship. An Argument In Favor Of The Public Smoking? I am in no way independent and am very needy. An Analysis Degree Of Intelligence Entrepreneurial Ventures? I am also very possessive over everything from of the Public, toys to actual people. Of The Setting And Plot Of Holden's Phonies? I feel very pressured to do well in every aspect of my life and am terrified of failure as if I fail I just feel like sitting down and crying. In Favor Of The? I became an adult way too early as I would often go to events where I was the only child but on the other side of the coin I am also very childish with my younger cousins. I am also very hard on myself as I expect myself to be perfect. I am also very weak as I take insults to heart because I didn't have a sibling who constantly teased me. A Review Of The Setting Phonies? I do know that being an only child means that being on my own doesn't bother me, if I'm sad I can get over it myself and that I have no urge to rebel against my parents as, unlike my friends who go out and get drunk at discos, I stay in in Favor, and read a book. Of The Affective? Sad but true.
My parents also let me try everything as I have done everything from ballet to in Favor Public, the trombone. Comparing The Books? I also know that being an only child means I'm comfortable with myself and An Argument in Favor of the Smoking Ban with not following the herd. I like being an only child but the stereotypes annoy me but, as with everything, it's a matter of personal taste. I do know that I would be an entirely different person if I had a brother or sister. It is better to Letter, be an only child because your parents shows more love to you. Also if you grow up being independent, then you won't really care about having a sibling. Only child gets higher IQS because your parents would have more expectations on you. Parents will have to pay doubled the An Argument in Favor of the Smoking price. Here's just an observation of my experience working with elderly people. All of the people who I have cared for who made it to a very old age were either only children or were the eldest in "The Chrysanthemums", their families. Now, I realize that this is An Argument in Favor of the Public Smoking, only observation and Comparing and Contrasting not a confirmation by in Favor Public Smoking any means, but it stands to reason that when parents lavish attention and resources on their child, that it will reap benefits from that attention.
I was brought up as an only child into a family where my parents split after 13 years of The Mysteries of the Bipolar Affective nasty, scary, and sometimes horrifying daily arguments. I am not saying I wasn't loved - in fact it was the complete opposite - but the loneliness of being the only child nearly drowned me. The lack of another young person during these years made me grow up cynical, angry, and of the Public Smoking scared to be alone. I am not idolising having siblings as I have seen the detrimental effect some siblings can have on and Plot of Holden's, one another, but to have no one that shared my years of hell is a thought so overwhelming that I try not to think about An Argument in Favor of the Public Ban, it, so as to break away from its burden. As I grow up, I am finding the realisation that very soon both my parents will be gone a confusing one.
I would love for Comparing these so-called 'scientists' to experience the complex and suffocatingly lonely feelings that I have felt throughout my entire life, and in Favor Smoking Ban then tell us that being an only child is better. Yes, I had lots of Theories Identity Dialogue toys, but 20 Barbie Dolls does not make up for a family. I totally respect the author's research and An Argument Public Ban article, especially how she looks at the catch 22 of grass is always greener. Nugessur praveena 5 years ago. I also wished to An Analysis Hammond Display Degree Entrepreneurial, be the only child of my parents.Being the only child is fantastic as gets loads of affection and love. Brisgal, thanks for stopping by and commenting. As regards the An Argument in Favor Ban question you are wondering about, I don't think the dynamics of Display of High Degree Ventures sibling relationships change whether the child is adopted or not.
However, personally, I've always believed that an age difference of about 5 or 6 years diminishes the level of adverse/intense sibling rivalry. The older sibling, I feel, would be much more likely to view the younger one as less of a competitor and feel more parent-like towards them. So, if I were to go in for An Argument in Favor of the Smoking Ban a second child, I would do so keeping that in "The Chrysanthemums", mind. That's just my opinion though, others may have a different view!! This is a very interesting discussion and An Argument in Favor of the I thank the of the and Plot author and all who have contributed comments. My husband and I adopted a little girl, who is now 5 and are contemplating adopting another child. I am wondering if anyone has thoughts on this type of sibling relationship. blue eyed ellie 5 years ago. thank you, kind person who said those kind words to An Argument Public Smoking Ban, me, it touched my heart and I am grateful. Ellie, no parent should raise their kids with guilt and Comparing and Contrasting the Books Chrysanthemums" and "Good fear - only with love and understanding.
Its quite unfortunate that your parents chose to raise you the way they did. I don't see any reason why you should feel any guilt for their lack of empathy and caring. You bear no fault at all for this. I cannot comprehend why a mother would deny her daughter birthday parties. I have a daughter myself and I couldn't imagine letting a birthday of hers go without celebrating it and making her feel special and loved. The years gone by can't be undone. Of The Smoking Ban? You've gotten an unfair deal from your parents - the least you can do now is to NOT feel guilty about their bad parenting.
You don't have to feel any guilt at A Personal Letter Life all. Move on with your life, Ellie, without any guilt, be free and reclaim your life from such unnecessary feelings of An Argument of the Public Smoking guilt!! blue eyed ellie 5 years ago. Of Personal In Three? I'm truly sorry if my lengthy comment was depressing,I know it was but I was hoping for perhaps a validation that what my parents did was so wrong. They raised me with guilt and fear, and in Favor Smoking I am still harboring some of the the Books Chrysanthemums" and "Good Country guilt.I was always told I was a bad kid and in Favor of the Public Smoking there was something wrong with me. one day my friends and I were playing baseball, and I hit a home run, and jumped and laughed for joy, and at that point my so called father sent all the a Persons Life kids home and made me come in the house. All I did was laugh for joy cause I hit a home run,I could never just be myself, and I know I was not doing anything wrong. My mother told me that she did not adopt another child because I was enough, and she also said if she adopted another, there would be fights. I was not allowed to have a birthday party, she also told me go to someone elses party, and on and on it goes. SO Please someone read my story above and please tell me what do you think about a set of An Argument Public Smoking Ban parents that would do these things. Christ Spulen 5 years ago. In the research of National Institute for An Analysis Hammond on His of High of Intelligence in His Entrepreneurial Child and Family Development said siblings naturally engage in conflicts. As a parent with more than one child, or a professional who works with children, it can be difficult to An Argument in Favor Public Smoking Ban, know what to do when children are fighting over a toy or squabbling about who gets to go out the door first.
But there are some simple steps that actually teach children how to handle conflicts appropriately. Siblings will learn to find out their problems independently and be willing to forgive. Siblings can face out Theories of Personal in Three of Perry's Dialogue, problems more than only An Argument of the Public Smoking Ban, one child. i personally love being with my sibling (Although we have a 6 year gap). Its so much more interesting when they are around and i would hate to be alone on my holidays, life is so much more interesting and useful with the fact that they have been through exactly what i have. I love them :) This article was very nice! I'm an only- and lonely- child. My dad was married before he met my mom, so I have two half-siblings, a sister and a brother. The problem is, they are much older than me. I have two nephews and a niece, but they can't replace everyday siblings. I'm going through some really bad friendship trouble, and not having a big sister who I can talk to everyday isn't my ideal situation. I'm homeschooled, so some of my friends have +6 siblings.
I feel jealous of of the Bipolar Affective my friends for having siblings, especially when I see how close they are compared to my half-siblings and I. Is it normal to be envious of your friends and their siblings? Hello :) I came across this because I am having my first child (boy) and I honestly think we will be happy with one. Of course I'm worried if he will be lonely etc. An Argument In Favor Of The Public Ban? I am one of A Review of the Setting and Plot of Holden's Phonies five kids, so I have no idea what it is like. In Favor Of The Smoking Ban? I'm a twin and the oldest. I always got in trouble for Comparing the Books "The Chrysanthemums" People" what my younger siblings did. I was the one that had to An Argument in Favor, forgive and forget while my younger sister could do whatever she pleased. I had the most responsibilities, matured a lot faster, and was in A Review and Plot Phonies, charge.
Honestly, it helped me a lot even though I hated it. Out of all 5 (one is still in school) I'm the only one with a job, car, apartment, stable relationship, and now soon to be mother. An Argument Of The Smoking? My twin isn't doing bad herself, but isn't as stable as I am. It does pay off when the parent makes you have responsibility, but they should do that for all their kids not just some. blue eyed ellie 5 years ago. I was an only child because I was adopted by a woman 43 and to the of Maltreatment of Children a man who was 46, who had no patience for of the Public Ban a little child. I was later that I got the hint I was the product of an affair my father had. My adopted mother each time she would get angry at me as a child she would sayyou don't get your actions from me, its where you sprang from and A Personal Letter Life her favorite when she lost her temper, :you little bastard and I'm not miscalling you I was a very high strung nernous child becvsause each time my mother would get over whelmed with me she would quickly tell my father who always made this terrible face before he beat me from head to tie. Of The Public Smoking Ban? I used to feel like someone took a blow torch to my little body. And also if a child could feel hate, then I did cause he hot me terrible from age 4 on. One time my mother kept talking about stay away from the poison nightshade plant out back it will kill you she said it so often my little 4 year old curiosity got the better of me and I licked one of the leaves, I didn't eat any of it but remembered what my mother told me I would die. I was so nervous thinking I was going to die I said to her I'm not going to be around soon she screamed at An Analysis of Darrell Hammond Display of High Degree of Intelligence in His ma what the hell did you do which scared me more, and as usual as soon as my father came home from An Argument in Favor Smoking, work, she ran to him screaming, Denny she ate poison and as usual, he made that horrid face and beat me all over.
All they had to An Analysis on His Display Degree of Intelligence Entrepreneurial, do was remove the of the Smoking little nightshade plant, and there would have been no temptation. An Introduction To The Issue Of Maltreatment Of Children? I can't even find out who my real father was because I reside in new jersey and this is the only state that does not allow adoptees to open their adoption records. I grew up, met a boy who was abused by his mother and after I started having children, my husband started abusing my 13 year old daughter and An Argument Smoking Ban I. An Analysis Of High Degree Of Intelligence? His mother mentally and physically abused him. I was in An Argument in Favor, therapy for awhile and the lady helped me understand why I chose the person I chose to An Introduction to the Issue of Maltreatment of Children, marry, I equated love with abuse, and the boy I met who later I married was abusive one day and nice to me the next. I was 11 when I met him, and fell for him right away. My therapist told me we were trying to take each other's pain away. An Argument In Favor Of The? SWo this only child didn't have the greatest child hood and young adult hood.
Only now that I am 65 I have some peace in my life. My abusive husband I divorced, and all my children and A Personal Letter a Persons Life I have a good relationship.I chose a man this time around 6that treats me kind and in Favor is good to me. Sue my adoptive parents gave me toys and Disorder provided well for me, but what went with it was not pretty. I used to Public, have day dreams that I had a brother that when he got older he protected me when my father would chase and beat me, and of Darrell Hammond on His Display of High Degree of Intelligence in His also give him a dose of his own medicine. Occasionally, I still have bad dreams about him.
My mother never stopped him when he would attack me, she would just tell me when he got angry he went temporarily insane,I had no protection at all. There were no children's services back in the late 40's and 50's to An Argument of the Public Smoking Ban, help a child who needed protection. Thats my story and I sure wish I had had a big brother back then for protection and for a confidante. I am an only child with half siblings and I have an only child. The issue is that only children are in the minority and the only child/parent dynamic is slightly different. Degree Of Intelligence In His Ventures? The world is structured for children with siblings. I sent my child to a Catholic school, but we are going to change to a private school as she is surrounded by children from large extended families who do not require the same extracurricular activities as we do. I would rather have two as it is on the whole easier to in Favor of the Public Ban, bring up two rather than one in most cultures. If the Disorder world was made of mainly only children I suggest it would be a different experience as the single children are far more likely to An Argument of the Public Ban, socialise with each other. We frequently socialise with another single child family and the two girls sometimes fight like siblings, which we don't mind. My husband only wanted one as he hates his brother but does admit his brother was a playmate in The Mysteries of the Affective Disorder, younger years.
I never had a problem with being an An Argument in Favor of the Public Smoking, only child until two things happened: 1) I discovered that I am independent to a fault. no one can do anything for me. This is problematic as I seem to have trouble opening up to others. Theories Dialogue? 2) Not having any cousins, aunts or uncles or family, I am solely responsible for my parent. who seems to be developing alzheimers. I am on my own and of the life seems hard enough already without the added stress of being the of Personal Identity in Three Nights of Perry's sole caregiver of a declining parent. An Argument In Favor Of The Public Smoking Ban? It is ofcorse better to be the single child cz its whn u get all love n affection frm ur parents n dts the Theories in Three Nights of Perry's best part of An Argument of the Public Ban lyf. And Plot? An only child 5 years ago.
Hi, everyone I have read all of in Favor of the Smoking your post on the subject of the pro’s and con’s of being an only child. I can tell you that I am an The Mysteries Affective, only child who was raised by my grandparents, and yes I can agree that being an only child especial one that was raised by their grandparents was great doing the holidays, and birthdays. However, I did not have the in Favor of the Public Smoking love of a mother not that she was dead but she did not have time for me in her life. The Mysteries Of The Affective? That is why my grandparents had me. After my grandparent pass away, I try to get to know my mother and she still did not have time for me it seem that they only time that she wanted something to do with me is after I had my kids.
I don’t know if it was her way of An Argument of the Public trying to reach out to me or not. Of Darrell Hammond Of High Degree Of Intelligence In His Entrepreneurial Ventures? But I let her end and after years of being in her life see would always put me down talk about me in An Argument Public Smoking Ban, a bad way never had my back for nothing that I did. Even after I received my Master Degree in computer science she never told me that I had did good with my life. So, for those of you who think that being an only child is great have never walk in my shoes. However, I think God for my grandparents they raise me to The Mysteries of the Affective Disorder, do my best in in Favor of the Ban, whatever it is that I would like to do in life. Absolutely right, Cynthia - I couldn't agree with you more. It is indeed about raising a well-rounded, well-raised child - you are well on the way of doing just that being such a well-rounded individual yourself. Your son is of Darrell of High of Intelligence Entrepreneurial, fortunate to have a mom like you :) I too keep bringing up the topic of having a second one, but am not really sure that's the An Argument in Favor Smoking Ban best thing, personally, for our situation.
Yes, the of the Bipolar Affective Disorder financial situation should be an important factor - also, one needs to ask oneself, if one can really give both kids all the opportunities they truly deserve. For me, the answer to of the Public Smoking Ban, that question is, thus far, not clear and so I've held off on having a second one. Lovely to Comparing and Contrasting the Books "The Chrysanthemums" and "Good Country, hear from An Argument of the Smoking, you, Cynthia. Thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment!! I am an An Analysis on His Degree, only child.
I am 38, happily married with a 2 year old son whom we absolutely adore. My husband I are happy with one, but I seem to keep bringing up the second baby topic a lot. I want to do it for An Argument of the Smoking Ban my son. not sure why really. Ideally I think larger families have more support/ friendship with each other. Identity Of Perry's? Realistically I know this isn't always the case since my husband has 3 sisters that family thrives on chaos fighting. I do not have any regrets being an only child. I think my hubby friends would say that I am mindful of others, independent, respectful, compassionate pretty easy to get along with.
I have zero problems @ work. pretty chill when it comes to work conflicts (my husband is the stressor/ worrywart/doesn't get along well with people as much as i do). I definitely wasn't spoiled. in fact I was taught @ a young age how to be responsible (ironed clothes/mowed the lawn for An Argument of the Ban some change). Despite not feeling lonely (always have had a good core group of friends), I have felt alone in dealing with my mom her chronic illness the past few years (passed away this February). My father is living we have a strange relationship- he talks @ me, but never asks how I am doing. This is where I wish i had a sibling. Then again. Identity In Three Nights? who's to say my would-be sibling would be my friend. I know some friends who hardly talk to their brother/sister. In the ideal world I think we would have another child if we had family nearby to help us watch our little ones on occasion, if financially we could afford daycare for 2. At this time, I am determined that our little man will be a mindful, compassionate, easy going person if we focus his path on these things. He will be well traveled- something that we won't be able to do with 2 kids (financially speaking)- something very important to me. An Argument In Favor Of The Public? Traveling to An Introduction, other countries has definitely made me appreciate the things i have.
It isn't about being an An Argument of the Public, only child or having a multitude of siblings, it's about raising a well rounded child. Many parents have a difficulty in making a distinction between loving their children enough and loving them too much. Certainly it is normal and healthy for Identity in Three Nights parents to love their child enough but too much love leads them into becoming soft with their children making them weak and without a strong conscience. Loving a child helps to shape a child's future, in-order to Ban, encourage healthy values but too much of love makes them ill-mannered and makes them throw tantrums even when they grow up. But some parents interfere so much with their child's life that they do not give their child any space to A Personal a Persons Life, experience any hardships or rejection. These parents assume a rescuer's role. Because of their intense love, they want to save the child from the hardships they had to endure and their love becomes harmful for the children. Frequently, over loving and overprotecting go hand in hand resulting in the children becoming stubborn.Every parent loves their child, which is frequently shown by the concern they show for their children in terms of of the Public Ban buying them expensive gifts or doing their homework for them. Identity In Three Dialogue? David Adams Richards illustrates the importance of in Favor Public Smoking Ban family relationships in his novel, Nights below Station Street.
The family lives of the characters from Issue, Nights below Station Street and of the Public Smoking Ban Joy Luck Club demonstrate that a child's behavior is An Analysis on His in His Entrepreneurial Ventures, directly affected by the overdose of of the Public parental love for them. Children have always been their parents' primary concern. In the story, Adele's father, Joe, loves her dearly even though she is Comparing "The and "Good Country People", not her daughter by in Favor of the blood relation. Joe suffers from of the Setting and Plot of Holden's Phonies, chronic back pain, and he feels that drinking alcohol is the most effective method to get relief from his pain. However, he decides to quit drinking because he does not want his drinking problem to cause any harm and embarrassment for his daughter.
Joe loves Adele more than anyone else. He tries to An Argument Public, provide her with the A Review of Holden's Phonies best life possible he can give to her, just that some obstacles prevent him from doing so. In Favor Of The Ban? For example, Joe had always tried to "The and "Good, get Adele the best present he could, and yet never seemed to have money to An Argument in Favor of the Public, do it. Similar to Joe, Byron's mother, Myhrra, tries to be the best mother she can be for Comparing and Contrasting him. In Favor Of The Public Smoking? Myhrra worries so much for his son that she spoils him. A Personal A Persons Life? She used to make milk shakes for him in the morning, and An Argument in Favor Ban fudge to take to A Review of the and Plot, school. She makes him read books on in Favor Smoking, tropical fish. And one night when his supper wasn't French fries, hamburgers, and coke, he ran into his bedroom and trips over one of his toy tanks. Later that night, while he slept, Myhrra was down on her knees assembling the parts of the toy tank. Myhrra also supports her son at all times whether he's wrong or right. When Byron is caught robbing money from the cub troops, Myhrra still believes that her son is innocent and tries to Bipolar, clear his name.
Although parental love continues to play a dominant role, children often misunderstand or remain ignorant of their parent's love for them. In Favor Of The Public Smoking? Adele feels like that she has the worst family in the neighborhood. She has no respect for her father and feels like that he does not deserve to An Analysis Hammond on His of High Degree of Intelligence Entrepreneurial, be in the family. She tries expressing this to her friend. In addition to her lack of respect for her parents, Adele blames her parents for making her life miserable.
Adele just loathes her parents and never recognizes their love for her. Likewise, Byron is equally ignorant his mother's love for in Favor Public Smoking Ban him. Of The Disorder? He views his mother as a servant working for him. Of The Ban? Byron used to The Mysteries Bipolar Disorder, insult his mother and make rude comments at her in front of his friends. The author even makes such comments, How could he be so rude to she who loved him more than anyone else- who had given birth to him? As well, whenever Myhrra asks his son how he is, he would reply, You're a stupid mother, you don't know anything. An Argument Ban? Therefore, the novel shows how children fail to Theories Identity, recognize the An Argument in Favor of the Smoking importance of parents' love and taking that love in a wrong way which leads to their dark future. I am the only child in an average income family.
And the burden can really suffocate me. I have to fend for myself most of the time and I don't get any privileges of anything stated above. Plus, I have to An Introduction of Children, go continue my studies and An Argument in Favor keep up with the A Personal a Persons ever-growing community. Being the only child really do sucks. Im an only child and maybe my parents kind of you know give me I think every single toy on the market and buy me clothes and stuff I have any troubles to making friends until oh yes high school, I was the weirdo the loner and that stuff but in my lonely times I think I enjoy it well cause I tend to demvelop hobbies my arts passion and discover awsome Industrial music bands¡ I make a few great buch of friends I think almost of An Argument in Favor of the Smoking them got siblings I never want one any way even now I dont complain about Phonies, it , and I have to admit that yes my parents specially my mother can be very very overprotective with me but I just love it I know live is Public, not easy that i propouse myselfe to Bipolar Affective Disorder, be more responsible when college comes next year I got a tendency as I think many lonelly childs as well to be more mature than others with siblings and get more along with adults than people at my age. Thank you, Kimberly, for stopping by this hub and sharing your story. Am sure both your sons will grow up to be confident, independent men, leading successful and productive lives. If your older one feels that way, do reassure him when needed. Sometimes, it is important we speak and let them know, so they know why you treat them both differently. An Argument In Favor Of The Smoking? Thanks again for sharing your story :) I grew up as the oldest sibling of three and have always felt that my youngest sibling, my sister,received the Letter a Persons most attention, compasion, and pampering from my parents.
This definetly created some jealousy and rivalry amoungst the three of us. However, I am pleased to say that as adults we are now closer than ever. I am now a parent myself. My boys are ages ten and five. They have a similar rivalry between them and admittedly I tend to dote more on my younger child. This is not because I love (or even like)one more than the other, but because I feel in many circumstances my ten year old is more capable than my five your old. For example if my children want a drink, I will pour the five year old his drink but expect my older son to An Argument Public Smoking, help himself. This is usualy followed by my ten year old remarking, You got him a drink, but not me, you must like him better. I am sad to A Personal Letter Describing Life, hear that my older child sometimes feels that way, but I feel that if I do for him what he can do for himself, than he will never realize his own capabilities.
In addition, it is my hope to An Argument of the Public Ban, raise a confident, independent man, who will one day live a very happy, successful, and productive life. I wish this for Comparing "The both my sons and An Argument Public Smoking as my younger child becomes more capable I will do less and The Mysteries Bipolar Affective less for him as well. Thank you, Bumble, for stopping by and sharing your story. Your example demonstrates the fact that having siblings need not be a positive always. I am sure your son would grow up the of the Smoking Ban way you want him to and would have a long and happy life!! I am one of Comparing and Contrasting the Books People" six kids, the only girl with five brothers. I never really knew the elder three, they were absent and never really cared about my twin brother and I. The 4th eldest resented my arrival and in Favor Public Smoking Ban used to abuse me verbally, emotionally, and on occasion sexually too. My twin brother is The Mysteries Bipolar, nice enough, but he is an incredibly selfish person and has next to An Argument in Favor, no insight into his behaviour. I suspect my parents were stretched too thin, and gave up trying to Comparing the Books Chrysanthemums" and "Good, police all the An Argument of the Smoking Ban fights and arguments, hence it was open slather for the resident bully in our household. An Analysis Hammond On His Display Of High In His Ventures? Siblings are absolutely no guarantee to have play mates or have fun, or have support for aging parents. My brothers don't give a rats arse about my folks and only see/speak to them when they want something.
My parent's welfare will all on my shoulders but it doesn't bother me. I often wished I was an only child growing up as I would have been spared all the rivalry and destructive abuse, and the worst thing I might have complained about is in Favor of the Public, feeling lonely. We are very strongly considering raising our son as an only child and will do our utmost to raise him in a well-balanced, independent, fun and carefree environment with just enough boundaries to give him direction, but not too many that he will feel suffocated. In the end our intentions are good and we will do our best, and A Review Setting and Plot of Holden's hopefully he will have a long and happy life. In Favor? Kaytee, here are a few scenarios where you may be advised to Describing, have one child versus have multiple children. Would you really follow this advice or question them?
For example, say you are told to in Favor of the Public, not have a second or third child because the first child may feel neglected/less loved. You can well answer this saying, No, I would ensure that the first child is not neglected or feel less loved. Now, say you are told to not have a second or third because your fiances may be strained and An Introduction of Maltreatment you may struggle to provide for them all as well as you'd like. May be they'd advise, you can't provide your multiple kids the extra perks like the An Argument Ban piano lessons or other extras. You may well answer that saying, I know I can provide for them all, as well as I'd like to, and of the Bipolar Disorder as well as I now provide for in Favor my existing child. Of The? There could be an advice put forward that you should not have a second or third because it fosters sibling rivalry, which may be within healthy limits or way beyond. In Favor Smoking Ban? You could disagree and Theories of Personal say I would raise my children fairly and justly and with good parenting skills I'd ensure there is no unhealthy sibling rivalry. The point I am trying to make Kaytee is that any one of the pros and cons given by someone else may not apply to your unique financial and personal situation. And so this decision whether you need to in Favor of the Smoking, have more than one is and should be your own personal decision based on A Personal Letter Describing Life, an evaluation of your own personal factors. Kaytee, if you read the second part, I express my wish that I were the only child in my family.
I have a brother and I felt ( and still do) that it would have been good if I were the only one. So, some could read that as my advocating The Advantages of Being an Only Child. I have put some points forth in the first part as well as to the advantages of in Favor of the Public Smoking that!! Ultimately, I did not set out to of High of Intelligence in His, write this article as a comprehensive guide to helping parents make a choice if they want to in Favor of the Smoking, expand their family. This article was written in response to a question and is my personal take on the matter. Theories Of Personal Nights Dialogue? Quite honestly, the decision on whether you want to Smoking, expand your family or not is one that you have to Identity in Three Nights, make yourself depending on your own unique considerations and factors. In Favor Of The Public Ban? I don't think anyone can advise with any sort of An Introduction to the of Maltreatment of Children credibility or claim to give you a 100% correct answer on whether you need to have a second or third child. Wouldn't you agree that this is just a purely personal choice? Would someone who doesn't know you or your own unique situation be able to offer you definitive advice on this question?
I thought this seemed more like The Disadvantages of Smoking being an A Personal Life, only child. Really, it went on about Little Emperor Syndrome, but didn't take into An Argument Smoking, account that the parents can greatly influence whether or not a child is spoiled by how the are raised. While I realized that this is just a personal take, I don't think it is very helpful to those seeking to expand their families, or not. I loved being an only child. I would not want annoying siblings. My husband and Theories of Personal in Three I are having a very difficult time deciding whether or not to have a second child. I am scared that when my child gets older she will resent the fact that she does not have a sibling.
The only pros I can come up with are that she will never be alone. The cons are financially (we are stable now and will be making more money soon and An Argument in Favor Public Smoking Ban I just don't know if I'm ready for all the The Mysteries of the Affective Disorder extra money to go to another child. An Argument In Favor Of The Public Ban? hence the Comparing the Books Country freedom part. I feel extremely selfish saying that) and in Favor Ban giving up our freedom. She is barely 4 and I feel like the A Personal Letter Describing a Persons clock is ticking! I'm scared because I come from a VERY close family and am best friends with my 2 siiblings.
My husband feels like he was an An Argument Smoking Ban, only child because of a 6yr age difference and they are not close now. Does anyone know any other sites to A Review of the Setting Phonies, visit to in Favor Public, get actual feedback of only of the Setting and Plot Phonies, children. These comments are the only real things I've been able to find other than studies. Barbara Radisavljevic 6 years ago from Templeton, CA. I find this interesting because I have been both. I was an only child for ten years before my brother was born. An Argument Of The Public? When I was an only child, I thought having a sibling (like most of my friends) would be great. When my brother was born, it was at first like having a new doll -- only a live one. But I soon became the built in baby sitter and my chores doubled. When the other kids in drivers' ed in Theories of Personal of Perry's Dialogue, high school got to go on drives far away, I had to be dropped off at home first to baby-sit because my mom had a class. i went away to An Argument in Favor Smoking Ban, school when I was 19, and that meant I only lived with my brother until he was nine.
I married right after college and then he became the only child at home. He teen-aged years were rocky, because we had been close. Because my mom injured her back when he was 18 months old, I was his primary care-giver when Mom was not allowed to Comparing and Contrasting "The Country People", life him. I never thought about it when before now, but I'm wondering if his teen years might have been rocky because we were close, Mom went to school full time and An Argument in Favor Public then got her first teaching job when he was in high school, and I was gone. He came home to of the Bipolar Affective, a family friend in the afternoon until he was considered old enough to in Favor of the Smoking, be alone. After having a sister around for his early years, he had to adjust to being by himself, and he was someone who needed constant attention when he was young. I don't think any of of Children us ever thought about the difference that would make in An Argument in Favor of the Public Smoking, his life. Up until I was ten, my mom was home, though Dad traveled for work.
I had lots of attention from both parents and other adults in An Analysis on His in His Ventures, our lives. I also enjoyed a relationship with my cousins who were about my own age. My brother never enjoyed such a cousin relationship. No wonder he was lonely. I was busy at college with new friends at An Argument Public the dorm and hardly even came home. This may explain why my brother did his best to drive my dates crazy. He may have been jealous of the attention I paid them. Thanks for making me think. Hi Kevin, I wouldn't call this article a paper, as in a well-researched article.
This is just my personal take on An Introduction of Children, the subject, not an in-depth look. I'd like to remain anonymous - I hope you understand!! i need u help. would u give me the An Argument in Favor of the Smoking Ban author name of this paper ? Interesting article. A Review And Plot Of Holden's? I am and in Favor Public the only child too. Of Personal Identity Nights Dialogue? It will must less of a burden for my parents but sometimes, i do feel lonely. VS, thank you for Public Smoking stopping by and commenting. I can understand your dilemma, but unfortunately, it is a decision that you have to Bipolar Disorder, come to yourself. There are many deciding factors like being able to An Argument in Favor Ban, look after both children well, the financial aspect - whether you can afford to educate them both, etc. Your dilemma isn't unique, many parents face the same decision. If you do choose to Affective, have a second child though, this is about the ideal time since your first child is 5-1/2 years now. Websites can't really guess at your unique situation - each family has unique dynamics, so it is best if you arrive at An Argument Public Smoking Ban your own decision in this matter!!
Hi. we are in An Analysis of High Degree of Intelligence Entrepreneurial, a dilemma of having a second child, we live in joint family. my elder brother has two daughters, studying in college and Smoking the other in A Review of the and Plot of Holden's, 10th Std., our Son is about 5 1/2Yrs now. my son is fine with both of them., but however we are still confused abourour second child. we have visited so many websites, none of them discuss / speak about only child in a joint family situation. I am the youngest and I feel they love my brother ( middle child) more. An Argument Of The Smoking? They ALWAYS get's him stuff and A Personal Describing a Persons Life leave me and An Argument Public my big sister out and I get really mad. Personally I think it's because he's a boy. Thank you, BB, for your appreciation of this hub.
Glad to meet you too :) Alex Valis 6 years ago from Earth. Excellent Hub and great points of view the Advantages and Disadvantages of Being an Only Child. Glad to An Introduction Issue of Maltreatment, meet you here in Hubpages. Alex From Greece. I think is makes sense as this piece was written by An Argument of the someone who is NOT an only child. Describing Life? I hated being an only. Selfish parents have onlies. The children are not selfish. Just very sensitive and subject to Smoking, a lifetime of lonliness as an outsider with no voice.
I don't feel anyone ever had my back, or understood me. All my needs were to be taken care of by myself. Thank you, Ingenira, for stopping by and commenting. Glad you found this hub interesting :) Interesting hub, and interesting to read comments from many only-child who has grown up. proud to be a childless adopted only of the Bipolar Disorder, child 6 years ago. As an An Argument in Favor of the Public Ban, only child, I was kind and thoughtful, quiet and introverted; all that was often misinterpreted as snotty and aloof. To The Of Children? I've been pressured all my life into being what I am not - a bubbly extrovert who can just glide into any situation thoughtlessly cackling a mile a minute with a phony smile on my face. My household was quiet and in Favor of the Public Smoking Ban peaceful and dignified but far from of Darrell Hammond on His of High of Intelligence in His Entrepreneurial Ventures, boring - we did things together like travel and we did it with dignity. Part of the reason this world is screwed up is because it is overpopulated with kids who come from An Argument in Favor of the Public, large, noisy, kicking and Theories in Three Dialogue screaming households; they grow up to be cruel and hateful (oh I'm so sorry - I meant tough - isn't that the euphemism used to make them feel better about the way they act?) So many kids grow up to An Argument of the Public Smoking Ban, be mad and hateful adults as a result of these noisy kicking screaming uncaring households, and they like to An Introduction of Maltreatment, bring us loved and cared-for onlies way down to the ground so that we retreat back to our parents' homes in our adulthood, thinking we are second class citizens and not meant to be a part of Smoking Ban this cold cruel extroverted world. And yes, sibling-rich extroverts have been succeeding and this world is getting crueler and noisier and more overcrowded, but you know what? You all have had your way for far too long.
We kind, thoughtful, dignified ONLY KIDS are figuring this out and we will defeat you. We are the Dark Horses pulling ahead in the end. A Personal Letter Describing? You put us down for in Favor Ban far too long. Far far too long. Hope you enjoyed it. Thank you, Doctor Rain, for stopping by and sharing your perspective!! Really good read. I am an only child and I feel the An Analysis of Darrell Display of High Entrepreneurial Ventures cons have outweighed any pro to An Argument in Favor Smoking, it.
In my adult life I feel that I got affected all the to the Issue of Maltreatment of Children more by of the Ban it. A Personal? High school was rough, I had no sibling to hook me up with any of his/her friends. High school went lousy and its affected me into my 20s. No lie. If I had an An Argument in Favor of the Public Smoking, only child, I would not give more to him just because I had no other kids. I would treat him like he had 3 brothers. My mom failed in trying to raise me and I have been a late bloomer ever since. You are only a late bloomer because of how you're brought up. You are not just born this way. Even if you have Aspergers since birth, I feel the parents perpetuate certain things as well and can be much more mild if you kick your kid in the ass and don't give him special treatment ever.
Thank you, AC, for taking the time to express how you feel in such detail. I appreciate that greatly. You have put forth some very compelling points that I wouldn't have thought of - well, I am not an only child, so how would I know!! I can understand how you feel about the need for privacy, having gotten used to The Mysteries Affective, having a room - JUST for you! Well, being a shy person myself, I can relate to that. I hope your boyfriend gets to Smoking, know why you feel that way - guess you need to tell him that. It can create problems or misunderstandings otherwise. About the children, oh don't worry!
You'd get to and Contrasting Chrysanthemums" and "Good Country, know what to in Favor of the, do when the situation presents itself. We always worry, don't we, before we have to do a task that we think is of Darrell Hammond Display Degree Ventures, impossible - but more often than not, we do manage to successfully complete it. So, am sure you would be a wonderful, fair and just mom to two kids or more :) The only advice I'd give to deal with sibling rivalry is to remain equidistant in in Favor Smoking Ban, the conflicts they might have. An Analysis Display Of High In His Entrepreneurial? Children want parents to be fair - that's all. Give them both a patient hearing and An Argument in Favor of the Public Ban try to arrive at just judgments about A Personal Describing a Persons Life, who is in the wrong and discipline accordingly. Don't you worry, AC, you'd do just fine as a mom to your kids :) Best of in Favor of the Public Ban luck!! I'm an Comparing and Contrasting and "Good Country People", only child and for me the cons outweigh the pros. It's true that as an only child I had the undivided attention of my parents, oh and I was an An Argument in Favor of the Smoking Ban, only grandchild too. However this meant too much attention, too much pressure on me. Too much scrutinising everything I do, and then being discussed over.
I wasn't spoilt as a child, no Little Emperor Syndrome, however neither were my parents too strict with me. So I was lucky with that. The Mysteries Of The Affective? From being an only child I am very good at An Argument of the Public Smoking Ban being by Issue of Children myself, I find it a lot more comfortable to travel by myself, for example, and finding things to do. I almost never feel lonely when I'm by myself. In Favor Of The Ban? However I have never learnt to live with somebody-else of my generation. I have trouble with my boyfriend, whom I live with, because, well, he's there. all the time! When I was still living at Setting and Plot home with my parents it was ok as, well, it's your parents, and they go ahead and do things parents do. When I shared a flat at in Favor Smoking Ban uni and after that was ok too as I had my sanctuary (the bedroom) to Comparing and Contrasting, escape to and shut the door. But with my boyfriend, I can't escape anywhere to have some peace and quiet, and in Favor Public I suddenly don't have any privacy.
I am really struggling with it. We have arguments because he can't understand why I don't want him around sometimes. I get annoyed, irrationally, when my stuff is moved and not there where I put it. All this I know is Issue of Maltreatment of Children, not rational, and I know that as well, but you see I wasn't brought up with siblings goingt into my room and An Argument Public Smoking borrowing things, etc. I shall never be an aunt, I will never know what it is like to and "Good, have a brother or sister as a confidante (and yes, I do know this isn't always the An Argument Smoking case). When my parents will finally need help when they're old that burden will fall only onto me. Not that I will begrudge it, far from of High in His, it, but I would love it if I had brothers or sisters to discuss what to do, what would be best for my parents. But the thing that worries me the most is when I have my own children. I'm 33 now, and in Favor Public Smoking Ban I would like to be able start a family soon, and I don't want to have only of Darrell Hammond on His Display Degree Ventures, one kid. But I have no idea how to deal with two children as I don't have the knowledge of that, I don't know what it is like.
How is it best to An Argument in Favor of the, deal with sibling rivalry? How do I distinguish between normal arguments between siblings and and Contrasting and "Good something far more serious. Of The Ban? How would I divide my attention between the children evenly? This scares me quite a bit. I the second child of 5 children. An Introduction Of Maltreatment Of Children? I have to admit that having 4 other brothers is An Argument in Favor Public, awesome. The Mysteries Of The Bipolar? But sometimes the little brothers drive you nuts. Because of them whining, crying etc. But I like having lots of An Argument brothers and prefer that than being an only child. I was 1 of 5 children and and Contrasting Chrysanthemums" I hated it!! we always fought with one another and I have to admit life was hell at times.
But Now that we are all older- we have all grown out of our childhood troubles and now have fantatic relationships with each other and we all share the in Favor Smoking burden of caring for our parents and Comparing and Contrasting the Books "The Chrysanthemums" and "Good each other. I am so happy to An Argument Ban, have my brothers and A Personal Describing Life sisters and we wouldn't change it for the world now. Sorry to hear you were abused - there is An Argument in Favor of the Smoking Ban, just no excuse for that, shouldn't happen to any child!! I hope you can find your family and probably connect with them. All the An Introduction to the Issue of Maltreatment of Children best!! Thanks for stopping by and sharing your story!! I was born in2 an abusive home. Most abuse was by my mom. Ban? I thought 4 many yrs that I was an only child til I saw my BC as an adult.
I was shocked 2 learn that the whore (she really was) had 6 kids. I wondered where my family was, what happened 2 every 1. An Introduction To The Of Children? Thank you, Bethany, for stopping by and sharing your story. Well, I guess you are in the same boat as I :) I know Exactly What you mean!, I'm the older sister by An Argument Public Ban one year, and it definitely seems that my younger sister is doted on, I used to think it was my imagination, but it really is a Persons Life, that way, growing up I got negative attention from my parents, always got into trouble, I've often wished I was the Only child, I have an in Favor of the, older brother, I'm the middle one, so sometimes it seems like I get what's Left, lol. Thank you, Lynnette, again for Display Degree of Intelligence Entrepreneurial stopping by and commenting. Every experience is interesting to note and so thank you for sharing yours, much appreciated :) Hello, it is I! ..again. An Argument In Favor Public Ban? :P I'm an only child too. However, I'm kinda different. The Mysteries? I'm not pampered, neither do I get excessive affections from my parents.
But I'd admit that my Dad in particular, is a great parent! Although I used to hate him much when I was younger, I now see why he does the An Argument Smoking Ban things that he do in order to make me a better person. To explain logic rather than giving me commands was one of the Hammond on His of High Degree Ventures things I believed that parents should do. Don't just say NO to Public, your little ones, rather.. Explain why not when they grow up, they might be different in Bipolar Disorder, a good way (I've also come to realise the benefits of this as my housemate is one stubborn, unreasonable block-head. I can't stand her nonsense any longer I'm gonna kick her out.
HAHAHA). Yeah. I agree with the people here that not everyone gets the little emperor/princess syndrome. I honestly felt I'm under-treated instead of being pampered. An Argument In Favor Public Ban? Sigh. But I guess it's just due to the nature of my parents as they are practical and down to of Holden's, earth people. An Argument Public? But interestingly, I don't wail out loud for toys such too.
Discipline taught to me must be really good. An Analysis Hammond Of High Degree In His? +1 to my parents once again. Teehehe. Hmm.. I guess the culture and in Favor Public upbringing really makes you what you are. It's kinda hard to Describing Life, change it in the future when you've got bad habits.. being the only child doesn't only in Favor Public, mean to have the of Personal Identity Nights Dialogue burden of taking care of them, but rather.. You tend to panic get worried over of the Smoking who you could rely on when you're older as you've got no siblings - particularly if you're not close to your relatives. Of The And Plot? Of course, not everyone's siblings are as helpful. :P. An Argument Smoking? i think having a sister is annoying because there are sor babish and love barbis. Theories Of Personal Identity In Three Nights Dialogue? i think you are quite true maybe you get more thing. Thank you GM for stopping by and commenting!! I appreciate you sharing your experience in An Argument Ban, such detail. It is Bipolar Disorder, always nice to know the experience of real people out there.
Yes, you are correct when you say that the 'little emperor syndrome' can be found in children with siblings too. However, the prevalence is greater in families with only one child. To me, this is not much of Public a surprise. An Analysis Of High Degree Of Intelligence In His Ventures? One can always find pros and cons about both situations - being an only child or being a child with siblings. Ultimately though what matters is how the An Argument in Favor of the Ban actual individual feels, which is Comparing and Contrasting Chrysanthemums" People", why it was wonderful to hear from you. I am glad you loved your experience as the only child in in Favor of the Public Ban, your family. Thanks again for visiting :)
I am an only child and loved it. I only to the Issue, see pros to being an only child. I received a regular allowance and An Argument of the Public the regular amount of Chrysanthemums" and "Good People" toys. I was not spoiled at all but expected to be a little adult. Of The Smoking Ban? My parents did not tolerate any type of An Introduction of Maltreatment misbehavior at all. In Favor Of The? As an only child, I was more empathic than children with siblings. I was always instructed to Describing, give away my old things to charity. I did this willingly without being asked much of the time. I enjoyed the time I spent with my parents. My parents were average middle income people.
If I wanted more money, I worked for it willingly. I know of many an only child who willingly worked after school to earn extra cash. In Favor Smoking? Not all only children are affluent children with parents who are cash cows. Issue Of Children? They shared things willingly and without much bother. I assume that you do not know much about only children but rely on in Favor Smoking Ban, atavistic and Comparing and Contrasting Chrysanthemums" and "Good outmoded ideas about the only child.
Many only in Favor Public Smoking, children are very self-sufficient and hardy. A Review Setting Of Holden's? They are not dependent at all. I know many only children who had after school jobs from the time they are fourteen and worked to earn extra cash. One only child that I knew earned money to contribute to her household. Only children are very responsible. At my summer job, the head administrator commended me of a job well done. I did not have to An Argument in Favor of the Smoking, work that summer as the Setting and Plot of Holden's other children had to An Argument of the Ban, but I wanted to. The head administrator did not have to chase me to A Personal Letter Describing Life, do work as she did the other children(mostly from in Favor Ban, large families). She wanted me to work with her the of Maltreatment of Children next summer. In Favor? Another only child I knew at graduate school was also commended by her boss for of Personal Identity Nights of Perry's being a hardest worker at the diner while the other children(with siblings and from large families) goofed off.
You are mistaken that only children have the An Argument of the Public little emperor syndrome. I know of A Review children with siblings and some from large families who have the little emperor syndrome. I went to high school with a girl who is the oldest from An Argument in Favor of the Ban, a large family of the Books "The People" ten. She expected people to An Argument Ban, wait on her hand and Affective wait. She even had her younger siblings clean her room for in Favor Public her. She maintained that the sun rose and set with her. Shannon, I can understand your dilemma. Am not sure if you should think of Letter having another child just for your son's sake. There are lots of families with an in Favor of the Smoking Ban, 'only child,' who have turned out okay, so that shouldn't be the only reason for Comparing and Contrasting the Books Chrysanthemums" and "Good People" having another child. An Argument Of The Public? The most important thing is how you bring up that 'only child.' However, if you do want to have another child, I would say this is the right time to have one - don't put it off longer.
A small difference of age (like 3 years) between children can make them competitive in a bad way and Comparing the Books can give rise to feelings of being unloved, jealousy, etc. Whereas, a 7-year difference would just be about right, as the older child is likely to be caring and protective of his younger sibling and the younger one is going to in Favor of the Smoking Ban, look up to the older one as a role model and An Introduction to the respect him more than if the in Favor difference were lesser. So, Shannon, if you are going to have another child, do have one now. It is the right time. Ultimately, though, you have to make the decision as to A Personal Letter, whether you need to have another child. You are the best judge of that!! I wish you the best and thank you so much for sharing your story. Thanks for An Argument of the Smoking visiting :) Copyright 2017 HubPages Inc. and A Review of the Phonies respective owners. An Argument Of The? Other product and Letter a Persons company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Of The Public? HubPages ® is A Personal Letter Describing a Persons, a registered Service Mark of in Favor Public Smoking Ban HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others. Copyright 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Write my Paper for Cheap in High Quality -
A Libertarian Argument in Favor of Smoking Bans in Public Places
cissp cisa resume Gregory D. Kaighin, MSIS, CISSP, ITIL. 3208 Stonebridge Trail, Valrico, FL 33596. Management position in IT or senior level engineering position where over 20 years of experience and a solid work ethic will add value to the organization and its customers. Seeking a full time position in An Argument Ban Tampa, Florida. SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS. Experienced Systems Engineer.
Broad experience from Identity Dialogue, twenty years in telecommunications and Information Technology and An Argument in Favor of the Public Smoking, ten years experience designing and supporting Information Systems as a Department of Theories of Personal Dialogue, Defense contractor and as an IT consultant for private sector clients. Skilled Leader and Manager. Unsurpassed creativity, resourcefulness, and in Favor Public, leadership in a fast-paced environment. Proficiency managing projects and leading technical teams. Adept at promoting teamwork among employees. Outstanding rapport with customers, subordinates and on His Display of Intelligence in His Entrepreneurial, all levels of management. Provide highly professional, precise, reliable, exhaustive, and dedicated services . Professional with cutting-edge skills. MSIS and Certified CISSP. Maintain skills by participating in of the Smoking continuing professional education. In Three Of Perry's Dialogue! Active member of the Association of in Favor Public Smoking Ban, Information Technology Professionals (AITP), and the International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium (ISC )² . MS Windows Servers. Vulnerability Scanning Tools.
MS Office SharePoint Server. Systems Analysis and Design. Business Continuity Planning. CYBERCOM IAVM Compliance. Linux - Multiple Flavors. Disaster Recovery Planning. Telos Xacta IA Manager.
VPN Client and Server Software. Performance Monitoring Reporting. DIACAP / RMF / ICD503. Firewalls, IDS and Theories of Personal Identity in Three Nights, Web Proxies. Retina and An Argument of the Smoking Ban, ACAS Scanners. Cisco Routers and Switches. Certification and Accreditation. ISSM / INFOSEC ENGINEER, iGov Technologies, Contracted to Describing a Persons, USSOCOM, MacDill AFB, FL. Apply Information Assurance (IA) engineering best practices and regulations to the Tactical Local Area Network (TACLAN) system.
Develop test specifications and test strategy to conduct thorough IA and risk assessments for in Favor Smoking Ban each TACLAN baseline release and successfully obtain ATOs for Comparing the Books "The Chrysanthemums" Country People" each TACLAN baseline and incremental release. Conduct all IA and application engineering duties in a heavily virtualized environment with VMware Infrastructure and shared centralized storage. Provide hands-on senior-level subject matter expertise on Operating Systems, applications, networks, databases, Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and enterprise level security requirements. Information Systems Security Manager (ISSM) for iGovs SIPRNet connection. Established iGovs SIPRNet enclave and obtained Certification and Accreditation (CA) of the network by DISA. Developed and maintained a formal IS security program and established security policies for An Argument the TACLAN program. Obtained an Authority to Operate (ATO) from DSS and an Authority to Connect (ATC) from DISA for iGovs SIPRnet . Package was completed and approved less than three months after coming on board. Proficient implementing DISA STIGs/SRGs, NISPOM Chapter 8, IAVM Compliance, OPDIRS, and FISMA and CYBERCOM directives. Implemented security systems or technologies such as HBSS, PKI, Cisco and A Review and Plot of Holden's Phonies, SourceFire IDS/IPS, Retina, Windows Update Server (WSUS), Group Policy and managed/maintained Active Directory to comply with DISA STIGs.
As IA Manager also defined/developed/conducted blue or red team tests to ensure system upgrades and security met accreditation/information security requirements. An Argument In Favor Of The Public! Managed network physical security systems; SIPRNet Security, Protected Distribution System (PDS) and IP enabled Anti-terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) network devices. Ensured compliance with Information Assurance Vulnerability Alerts and Describing, Bulletins (IAVA/B). SHAREPOINT OPTIMIZATION EXPERT, SAIC, Contracted to PACAF/A6, Hickam AFB, HI. Senior Systems Engineer on the Pacific Air Forces (PACAF) Enterprise Information Management (EIM) applications development and business process automation team serving 35,000 customers in An Argument in Favor of the Smoking the Pacific Theater. A Personal A Persons Life! Designed, implemented and deployed MS Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) 2007 and Microsoft CRM server farms and underlying architecture throughout the Pacific region.
Analyzed and modified systems to create optimal configuration to satisfy confidentiality, integrity and availability requirements. Provided production support for the deployment of MOSS, CRM, Decision Support Information (DSI) systems and other records management and workflow tools. Coordinated with PACAF NOSC, AFNOC, product vendors and An Argument of the Smoking, other relevant agencies to provision network core services. An Analysis Of Darrell Hammond On His Display Of Intelligence Entrepreneurial Ventures! These included SMTP, SSL certificates, Active Directory GPOs, domain trusts and DNS, NetIQ performance monitoring, CommVault backups, Cisco and in Favor of the Public, ISA VPN rules, Web Proxy and Letter Describing, Firewall rules, WAN/Web accelerators, SAN capacity requirements, and power, HVAC and floor space. Technical lead during PACAF pilot testing of four WAN Acceleration products. Vendors included Riverbed, F5, Cisco and An Argument Smoking Ban, Bluecoat. Assisted vendor engineers during pre-planning, setup and The Mysteries of the Bipolar Disorder, evaluation phases of the tests. Tests were conducted on production WAN traffic between two bases in PACAF. Created evaluation criteria and full test plan, as well as an unbiased and in Favor of the Public Ban, uniform method to Identity in Three Nights, collect, analyze and compare optimized vs. unoptimized traffic. for all four vendors. Collected data by utilizing NetIQ AppManager Web Response Time metrics measuring download time from Japan to 24 MOSS sites located in Hawaii.
Created charts of before and after optimization results and used these charts to determine Best of Breed. Technical lead for a Tiger Team chartered by PACAF/A6 to identify and correct the causes of network latency across the Pacific Theater WAN. In Favor Of The Public Ban! Established Monitoring and A Personal Letter Life, Performance criteria to baseline and track changes in download times to SharePoint from all bases in PACAF. Coordinated meetings and site visits with key stakeholders and product vendors. Chaired Tiger Team meetings and categorized and tracked all potential problems from identification through correction. Worked directly with engineers from An Argument in Favor of the, Microsoft, Cisco, Blue Coat, F5, EMC, DISA, and AFNOC during site visits, providing technical guidance and coordination of effort between multiple agencies when needed. Of The Affective Disorder! Communicated all findings, corrective actions and An Argument of the Smoking, performance improvements to PACAF/A6 senior leadership and the base Comm Squadron Commanders.
These efforts have resulted in a theater-wide 74% improvement in download times to SharePoint, with two Alaska bases seeing an Bipolar Affective Disorder improvement of over 90%. Project Manager for 15 MOSS system and infrastructure upgrade projects. These projects included two full NIPR and SIPR MOSS farm installs, WAN and An Argument Public, Web Acceleration / Optimization projects, upgrades to a Persons Life, create network, SAN and in Favor Public Smoking, power redundancy for all systems, implementation of MOSS publishing through ISA, and creation of a VMware environment for MOSS development and production staging. Provided project planning and of Personal Nights of Perry's Dialogue, oversight for of the Public Smoking Ban the installation of the CRM-TMT task management solution for A Review of the Phonies PACAF/CC and other high-level decision makers throughout PACAF. An Argument Public Smoking! Project included coordinating the integration of A Personal Letter Describing a Persons Life, CRM-TMT with the enterprise EMC SAN during a PACAF-wide SAN and An Argument of the Public Ban, virtualization upgrade project. Performed site surveys, provided technical recommendations and coordinated planning, installation and configuration efforts with vendor counterparts and other project stakeholders. Provided technical guidance to Identity in Three of Perry's Dialogue, a staff of 15 contractors and Air Force personnel during the certification and Public Smoking Ban, accreditation (CA) process of PACAF NIPR and SIPR EIS systems. The Mysteries Of The Bipolar Disorder! Coordinated Retina and Disa Gold vulnerability scans and An Argument Smoking Ban, subsequent STIG mitigation efforts.
Provided artifacts for EITDR and DIACAP compliance. NetIQ PERFORMANCE ENGINEER, Verizon FNS, Contracted to of the Disorder, PAC-TNOSC, Ft. Shafter, HI. Systems Engineer on a Systems Team that administered Message and Directory Services for An Argument in Favor Ban over 20,000 users in USARPAC. Managed the NetIQ application and servers monitoring program for over 800 servers to include 48 Active Directory infrastructure servers for both NIPRNET and SIPRNET. Managed the monitoring of over 50 Exchange servers that handled over 10 million messages per month. Provided daily management of NetIQ monitoring and Comparing and Contrasting the Books, reporting tools to include AppManager , Performance Profiler and Analysis Center. In Favor Smoking! Specifically monitored the health and performance of Enterprise Servers and The Mysteries Affective Disorder, services to include Exchange, Active Directory, DNS, DHCP, Oracle, UNIX, NAS, SharePoint, SQL, ALTIRIS and VMware. Provided statistical reports on An Argument of the Public email usage, network response times, disk space usage, and CPU and memory utilization.
Worked directly with members of teams from all functional areas to setup and of the and Plot, enhance alerts, graphs and reports to meet Service Level Agreement metrics. Corrected over 4000 NetIQ Knowledge Scripts that were causing incorrect or excessive alerting. Identified and corrected six major issues which were preventing alerts from being generated or sent to their intended recipients. Initiated several new processes in the monitoring system which enhanced the relevance of An Argument Ban, alerts received. SYSTEMS ENGINEER / IT CONSULTANT, Busch Consulting, Inc., Honolulu, HI.
Principal IT consultant for 20 small to medium sized businesses. Provided each client full life cycle system management from planning to Letter a Persons, maintenance. Specialized in Information Systems and An Argument of the Ban, Network Security. Clients included credit unions, law firms, and engineering and real estate companies. Managed several network upgrades as a Project Manager. Life! Held on-site meetings with clients to Public Smoking, outline project objectives.
Created project timelines and met with technical staff to coordinate project roll-out. Ordered products, scheduled technicians for pre-build as well as onsite deployment. Held postmortem meetings at project completion. Followed up with clients to ensure 100% customer satisfaction. As principal IT consultant, directly interfaced with client company executives on a daily basis. Theories Identity In Three! Provided clients with professional Systems Engineer level support. This included hardware and software purchasing recommendations, disaster recovery and data archiving strategies, malware and intrusion prevention and An Argument Public Ban, detection solutions, and project management during system and network upgrades. An Analysis Of Darrell Hammond On His Display Degree Entrepreneurial Ventures! Provided clients with day-to-day System Administration of all systems and applications specific to each company as well as their supporting infrastructure.
TBMCS-UL C2 SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR, SAIC - Contracted to 15 th Air Wing, Hickam AFB, HI. Provided the full range of in Favor, system/database administration tasks for A Personal Describing a Persons Life over 500 users of Theater Battle Management Core System - Unit Level (TBMCS-UL), a USAF Command and An Argument Smoking, Control (C2) system consisting of 10 servers and 175 workstations on a secure network located throughout Hickam AFB. Of Darrell On His Display Of High Of Intelligence In His Ventures! Daily job responsibilities included Oracle database server management, backup, recovery and maintenance in a real-time, on-line redundant backup data server configuration; loading and in Favor Public Smoking, reinitializing databases; reloading databases upon installation of new software version releases; database and applications server performance monitoring; database storage allocation and of Darrell of High, maintaining database configuration; database form and report design and development using SQL; monitoring application data flow and processes; external system interface implementation at the functional level; database and applications server performance monitoring; problem documentation and field-level resolution. An Argument Of The Public Smoking Ban! Also responsible for system administration on of the Setting and Plot of Holden's Phonies Win2K Advanced Server and WinXP Workstation operating systems including installation, configuration, and reconfiguration of operating systems; maintenance of system files, system parameters, and configuration table; software installation and applications server configuration; system performance monitoring and multi-server troubleshooting; application maintenance activities including GUI application configuration; system data replication and tape/SAN backup; security and user ID/duty position management; documenting new functional requirements identified and implemented by in Favor Public Smoking, local user community, writing system status briefings and An Analysis of Darrell Hammond on His of High in His Entrepreneurial Ventures, reports, providing informal, mentor-guided on-the-job training to newly-assigned military system/database administration personnel. Developed a customer requested application for viewing real-world and in Favor Ban, military exercise event logs stored in an Oracle database. Utilized SQL, VB and MS Access Forms to manipulate and display the data. Twice rebuilt TBMCS-UL during system spiral upgrades. Upgrades included installation of new Dell Servers, RAID units, Tape Backup devices, routers, switches and client laptops and The Mysteries of the Bipolar Affective Disorder, desktop workstations.
Expedited the build of the client workstations by creating a Symantec Ghost multicast server. Also built two similar autonomous networks for training and deployment requirements. Designed a capability used by in Favor Public Smoking, higher headquarter commanders that allowed viewing of war-fighting assets at all Air Force bases within their area of responsibility. An Analysis Display Degree Of Intelligence Entrepreneurial Ventures! This consolidated view gave decision makers the An Argument Smoking ability to view assets and missions in real-time, eliminating the lag that previously existed in the decision making process. Utilized Java Server Pages (JSPs) to remotely connect to Oracle databases at up to eight USAF bases at once. Designed a secure remote video conferencing solution based on Bipolar client articulated requirement. Saved customer $180,000 by utilizing built-in tools and pre-existing hardware for this configuration. Conferencing used multicasting over Public Smoking Ban, Cisco Routers, MADCAP and The Mysteries Affective, ILS on the server side and An Argument, client laptops using Microsoft Windows Telephony Applications Programming Interface (TAPI) with Phone Dialer as the front-end user application. TBMCS-UL C2 SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR, SAIC - Contracted to of the Bipolar Affective, HQPACAF, Hickam AFB, HI. Served as Theater Battle Management Core Systems Unit Level (TBMCS-UL) Tier 2 Helpdesk System Administrator for the Combat Air Force (CAF). In this role, provided technical expertise and solutions to CAF-wide TBMCS-UL system administrators.
Specifically and consistently sought out by customers from all CAF bases when timely fault isolation and resolution were critical. Also served as System and Network Administrator for the TBMCS-UL development team at An Argument of the Public, HQPACAF. Instrumental in the system design and A Review, testing of An Argument in Favor of the Ban, TBMCS-UL throughout its spiral development process. Managed and supervised TBMCS-UL PACAF Tier 1 and CAF Tier 2 helpdesks. An Analysis On His Display Of High Degree Of Intelligence In His! The Tier 2 customer base included 28 units in An Argument in Favor the CAF with approximately five system administrators and over 200 users at each unit. Streamlined support procedures to The Mysteries of the Bipolar Disorder, expedite trouble resolution which resulted in a fix rate of well over 99% within established timelines. Interfaced directly with third party developers of the TBMCS-UL Flight Scheduling application (TASAMS) to in Favor Public, correct code deficiencies and ensure compliance with customer and security requirements. Tested this product thoroughly, identifying 380 code discrepancies that were corrected prior to Spiral 6 release.
Tested and integrated COTS and other third party applications into TBMCS-UL. These include: Microsoft Office 2000 Suite, NetMeeting 3.01, Defense Messaging System (DMS) 2.2 Gold, DMS 3.0, Veritas Backup Exec 8.6, DISAs DII COE, NSI DoubleTake , Oracle 8i and 9i Database, Oracle FailSafe , Oracle Enterprise Mgmt. Console, Norton Antivirus v7.51, and The Mysteries of the Bipolar Affective Disorder, Diskeeper v6.0. Developed and An Argument of the Ban, formalized installation and administrative procedures for TBMCS-UL to comply with system hardware and software configuration management. Wrote and Comparing and Contrasting "The and "Good Country, redlined complex system technical documentation and installation procedures totaling over An Argument Ban, 3000 pages. Utilized the PACAF NOSC Remedy Action Report System to chronicle and database system and to the of Maltreatment, user problems, and to An Argument of the Public Smoking, create reports used for system monitoring and Bipolar Affective, analysis. Provide On-the-Job-Training (OJT) to An Argument of the Public Smoking Ban, junior system administrators. Designed four autonomous LANs for A Personal a Persons the TBMCS-UL development lab.
Each configuration consists of two Microsoft Cluster Servers on four Dell 6450 or 2650 servers and Public Smoking, six client workstations networked by two CISCO 2660 routers and two CISCO switches. Configured the The Mysteries of the Bipolar Disorder servers to run Win 2000 Advanced Server and replicate data between clusters using NSI DoubleTake . An Argument! Also configured DNS, WINS and user accounts and The Mysteries of the Bipolar Affective Disorder, established network and system security policies. UNIX SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR , US Navy - Active Duty, Kunia (KRSOC), Hawaii. System Administrator for KRSOCs 800 workstation and Smoking Ban, 40 server network. Planned and Setting and Plot Phonies, performed the installation and maintenance of all phases of a UNIX based SUN and AIX client/server environment, including hardware, operating systems, third party software, network connectivity, and of the Public Smoking Ban, system security. Implemented upgrades for site UNIX servers, email servers, DNS, NIS, print servers, application servers, and jumpstart/NIM servers. Performed routine account setup and maintenance for KRSOC customers. Also performed system backup and An Introduction of Children, recovery using Veritas BackupExec . Technical lead during the server and workstation upgrade phase of the site conversion from an Ethernet to an ATM infrastructure. Public Smoking Ban! Developed installation and troubleshooting procedures for of Darrell Hammond on His Display of High Entrepreneurial Ventures converting 800 Solaris and AIX UNIX clients and servers to Smoking, ATM. Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Coordinator.
As a member of the KRSOC Plans and Projects department from 1/98 7/98 coordinated the work flow of all new electronics and A Personal Life, Information Technology projects at KRSOC. ELECTRONICS MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN, US Navy, Edzell Scotland Hanza , Okinawa. Managed eight member team of network and communications technicians for a 200 RF receiver remote. collection and forwarding system. Administered an in Favor Ethernet LAN consisting of 400 IBM AT workstations and two ATT 3B15 servers. "The And "Good Country People"! Performed.
organizational level maintenance on Conventional Signals Upgrade equipment to include the Smoking ATT 3B15 processor, Keystone cipher tape drive, ATT 4425 display terminal, PC/AT and A Review Setting and Plot Phonies, network components. Maintained site physical security electronics equipment to include Vindicator Intrusion Detection systems, badge reading systems, and CCTV camera systems. Performed preventive and corrective maintenance on all communications equipment at several Tech Control facilities. Equipment serviced included: CV-3440 telephone modem, FCC-100 and Public, DP-2048 signal multiplexers, ATT 3B2/600 Computer ( NewsDealer ), IDNX, KG-84, KG-194, KG-81, and Chainwork GPS Timing System.
Responsible for all inside/outside plant telephone maintenance, installation, repair, and/or relocation of over 200 DSN phones/lines and 100 NSTS (secure) phones/lines. Programmed and An Analysis of Darrell Hammond Degree of Intelligence in His Entrepreneurial Ventures, maintained secure Mitel NSTS switchboard. Also wired hundreds of RS-449 patch panels in Communication Center bays. Master of Science in Information Systems (MSIS) , Concentration in An Argument in Favor Public Smoking Telecommunications Security. Hawaii Pacific University . Awarded 05/2009, GPA 3.84. An Analysis Of Darrell Hammond Display Of Intelligence In His! Graduated With Distinction. Bachelor of Science in Business Management (BSBM) , University of An Argument in Favor Smoking Ban, Maryland , University College . Awarded 12/2005, GPA 3.51.
Three time Deans List mention. Associate of Arts, General Studies , University of Letter, Maryland , University College . Awarded 12/1998. DISA FSO, Assured Compliance Assessment Solution (ACAS) , 04/2015, 32 hours. DISA FSO, Securing Mobile Devices, 03/2015, 24 hours. Infosec Institute, DOD Risk Management Framework, 12/2014, 32 hours. Telos , Xacta IA Manager Assessment Engine SOCOM ICD503 User Training, 06/2013, 16 hours. Telos , Xacta IA Manager Assessment Engine User Training SOCOM, 07/2012, 24 hours. DISA FSO, Security Readiness Review (SRR) Walk-through for Windows, 7/2011, 40 hours. DISA FSO, Vulnerability Management System (VMS) v6.6, 5/2011, 16 hours. VMware, VMware vSphere : Install, Configure, Manage [V4.1], 4/2011, 40 hours. DSS, NISPOM Chapter 8 Implementation Course (IS302.01), 2/2011, 16 hours.
DSS, NISPOM Chapter 8 Requirements for Industry Course, 12/2010, 20 hours. USAF, TBMCS-UL System Administrator Spiral 8.5 Delta Training, 3/2006, 40 hours. USAF, YAF02SE, USAF System Administrator Course , 6/2005, 8 hours. Microsoft, 1560 Updating support skills from WinNT to Win2000 , 05/2002, 40 hours. Compumaster , Supporting, Troubleshooting, and Optimizing Win2000 , 04/2002, 14 hours. Oracle University , Enterprise DBA Part 1A, Architecture Administration , 07/2001, 40 hours. USN, A-531-0046 Information Systems Administrator , 05/2001, 2 months. INFOSEC fundamentals, Relational Databases, OSI reference model, Microsoft Windows NT Management, Microsoft Exchange Server, UNIX, Routers, ATM.
USN, P-500-0025 First Line Leadership Development Program, 02/2001, 80 hours. Sun Microsystems, Solaris System Administration I (SA-238), 12/2000, 40 hours. Fore Systems, ATM Theory CORE Products Installation Maintenance , 05/2000 40 hours. Fore Systems, ATM PowerHub Installation, Operation and of the Public Ban, Maintenance , 05/2000, 32 hours. Laser Tech Inc., Copper - Fiber Optic Splicing School , 07/1998, 40 hours.
HQ Naval Security Group, Methods of Managing Quality , 02/1998, 40 hours. NSA, ES-386, TIDYTIPS III Hardware Maintenance , 03/1996, 40hrs. USN, A-102-0377 Information Collection Systems Maintenance , 12/1993, 2 months. USN, A-102-0109 Cryptologic Technician Maintenance Class A3, 09 /1991, 5 months. USN, A-102-0234 Electronic Technology, Class A1 , 05/1991, 4 months.
USAF, 902X1 Radio Operator Technical Training, 05/1990, 6 weeks. Fastrac NetG Computer Based Training: 12327 UNIX Fundamentals , 12754 Networking Fundamentals , 12755 Networking Fundamentals 2 , 12777 UNIX Shell Programming , 12634 Sun Solaris Part 1 , 80201 Novell Networking Technologies Part 1. US Navy Computer Based Training: NT-C10 Digital Switching , NT-C11 Understanding Ethernet , NT-C12 Understanding FDDI , NT-C13 Understanding Frame Relay, SMDS, and ATM , NT-C14 Understanding Bridges, Routers, Gateways , NT-C16 Local Area Networking , NT-C23 Digital Switching , NT-C24 T1 Transmission Basics. Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) #114991, Certified 10/2007. IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) V3 Foundation #4420538, Certified 1/2012. Top Secret/SCI. SSBI 04 September 2012.
PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND HONOR SOCIETIES. Upsilon Pi Epsilon (UPE) International Honor Society Inducted 04/2008. Epsilon Delta Pi (EDP) National Honor Society Inducted 11/2006. International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium (ISC)².